Verification of the Vitek Reveal System for Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Gram-Negative Positive Blood Cultures

被引:3
作者
Menchinelli, Giulia [1 ]
Squitieri, Damiano [2 ]
Magri, Carlotta [2 ]
De Maio, Flavio [1 ]
D'Inzeo, Tiziana [1 ,2 ]
Cacaci, Margherita [2 ]
De Angelis, Giulia [1 ,2 ]
Sanguinetti, Maurizio [1 ,2 ]
Posteraro, Brunella [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Lab Ematolog, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Sci Biotecnol Base, Clin Intensivol & Perioperatorie, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Unita Operativa Med Precis Microbiol Clin, Direz Sci, I-00168 Rome, Italy
来源
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL | 2024年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
antimicrobial susceptibility testing; blood cultures; international standard for organization; verification; Vitek Reveal assay; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE;
D O I
10.3390/antibiotics13111058
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 20776-2:2021, which replaces ISO 20776-2:2007, focuses solely on the performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) assays, emphasizing the ISO 20776-1 broth microdilution method as the reference standard. Consequently, categorical agreement (CA) and associated errors should not be applied. We verified the Vitek Reveal AST assay according to both ISO 20776-2:2021 and ISO 20776-2:2007 criteria. Methods: Samples from 100 simulated and clinical Gram-negative (GN) positive blood cultures (PBCs) were tested at a large teaching hospital. The simulated GN-PBCs were obtained from a hospital collection of isolates selected to represent diverse antimicrobial resistance profiles. The Reveal assay results were compared with those from the reference assay, and the time to result (TTR) for the Reveal assay was calculated. Results: The essential agreement rates were 96.1% (816/849) for simulated and 98.8% (929/940) for clinical GN-PBC samples. The bias values were -3.1 for simulated and -11.0 for clinical samples. The CA rates were 97.7% (808/827) for simulated and 99.2% (924/931) for clinical samples. The mean TTR +/- SD (hours) for resistant organisms was significantly lower (4.40 +/- 1.15) than that for susceptible, increased exposure (5.52 +/- 0.48) and susceptible (5.54 +/- 0.49) organisms. Conclusions: Our findings reinforce the potential of the Reveal assay as a valuable tool and support its implementation in clinical microbiology laboratories.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[21]   Association Between Time to Appropriate Antimicrobial Treatment and 30-day Mortality in Patients With Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Van Heuverswyn, Jasper ;
Valik, John Karlsson ;
van der Werff, Suzanne Desiree ;
Hedberg, Pontus ;
Giske, Christian ;
Naucler, Pontus .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 76 (03) :469-478
[22]   Retrospective evaluation of rapid genotypic ID and phenotypic AST systems on positive blood culture turnaround time and simulated potential impacts on bloodstream infection management [J].
Yuceel-Timur, Ismail ;
Thierry, Elise ;
Chainier, Delphine ;
Ndao, Ibrahima ;
Labrousse, Maud ;
Grelaud, Carole ;
Bala, Yohann ;
Barraud, Olivier .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2024, 79 :i26-i31
[23]   How to verify and validate a clinical microbiology test before it can be used in routine diagnostics: a practical guide [J].
Yusuf, Erlangga ;
Schijffelen, Maarten J. ;
Lee, Mariska .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2024, 30 (10) :1261-1269