Improving machine learning predictions to estimate fishing effort using vessel's tracking data

被引:1
|
作者
Samarao, J. [1 ,4 ]
Moreno, A. [1 ]
Gaspar, M. B. [1 ,3 ]
Rufino, M. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Portuguese Inst Sea & Atmosphere IPMA, Av Dr Alfredo Magalhaes Ramalho 6, P-149565 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Sci, Ctr Stat & its Applicat CEAUL, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] CCMAR, Faro, Portugal
[4] Nova Sch Sci & Technol FCT, Almada, Portugal
关键词
Fishing effort; Machine leaning; Spatio-temporal high-resolution data; Small scale fisheries; FISHERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102953
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Small-Scale Fisheries (SSF) comprise over 80 % of the global fleet and serve as the primary income source for numerous coastal communities. However, these critical fisheries face various threats. To effectively monitor SSF activities and their ecological impacts, it is required precise estimation of fishing effort using high-resolution spatio-temporal data. This information can identify areas with high fishing density, warranting protection of their main fishing grounds against other users (i.e. ocean grabbing), while also signalling potential stock depletion requiring management interventions and preserving the ecosystems from which these fisheries depend on. In this study, we propose a series of steps to enhance the performance of Machine Learning algorithms in estimating fishing effort. We assessed seven supervised ML algorithms, including Logistic Regression, Ridge Classifier, Random Forest Classifier, K-Neighbours, Gradient Boosting Classifier, LinearSVC, Recurrent Neural Networks and XGBoost, using four case studies, from bivalve dredge and octopus pots and traps fisheries. First, in a preliminary statistical analysis between common error measures derived from the confusion matrix was decided to use accuracy, precision, and sensitivity as evaluation criteria. We found that a simple moving average applied to speed, employed as a pre-processing technique using ten neighbouring points, showed up to 3 % improvement in results. Random Forest and XGBoost gave the best performances among the models compared (18 % change), using the variables Latitude, Longitude, Speed, Time, and Month (accuracies near 99 %)(61 % change). The proportion of the training/test dataset, showed a minimal impact on accuracy, with changes of less than 8 % when varying the training data percentage between 10 % and 90 %, making 60 % a suitable compromise. Considering the sampling unit to be (1) point-based (randomly selected pings) or (2) boat trip-based (randomly selected boat trips), leaded to changes in accuracy between 2.53 % and 3.99 %, depending on the model. Temporal resolution (ping rate) showed minimal effects on model performance, ranging from less than 2 % for intervals between 30 s (raw data with irregular time series) to 10 min (regular time series). As a post- processing step, it was concluded that replacing isolated data points with neighbouring values, significantly enhanced the detection of fishing events, with improvements ranging from 80 % to 250 %, depending on the model. In conclusion, this study presents a straightforward procedure for selecting a machine learning method and enhancing its power of classification using simple procedures. These approaches should be applied in all works using machine learning to produce fishing effort maps.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting Fishing Effort and Catch Using Semantic Trajectories and Machine Learning
    Adibi, Pedram
    Pranovi, Fabio
    Raffaeta, Alessandra
    Russo, Elisabetta
    Silvestri, Claudio
    Simeoni, Marta
    Soares, Amilcar
    Matwin, Stan
    MULTIPLE-ASPECT ANALYSIS OF SEMANTIC TRAJECTORIES, 2020, 11889 : 83 - 99
  • [2] SmartPass: Using Smart Cameras and Machine Learning to Measure Fishing Effort
    Haukebo, Sepp
    Poon, Sarah
    Garren, Melissa
    Cusack, Chris
    Kenyon-Benson, Justine
    Schindler, Eric
    Tate, Brian
    OCEANS 2021: SAN DIEGO - PORTO, 2021,
  • [3] Improving Fishing Pattern Detection from Satellite AIS Using Data Mining and Machine Learning
    de Souza, Erico N.
    Boerder, Kristina
    Matwin, Stan
    Worm, Boris
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [4] A predictive model to estimate effort in a sprint using machine learning techniques
    Ramessur M.A.
    Nagowah S.D.
    International Journal of Information Technology, 2021, 13 (3) : 1101 - 1110
  • [5] Improving Electron Density Predictions in the Topside of the Ionosphere Using Machine Learning on In Situ Satellite Data
    Dutta, S.
    Cohen, M. B.
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 20 (09):
  • [6] Macroeconomic Predictions Using Payments Data and Machine Learning
    Chapman, James T. E.
    Desai, Ajit
    FORECASTING, 2023, 5 (04): : 652 - 683
  • [7] Using Machine Learning and Simplified Functional Measures to Estimate Software Development Effort
    Lavazza, Luigi
    Locoro, Angela
    Meli, Roberto
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 142505 - 142523
  • [8] Improving Crop Yield Predictions in Morocco Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Ed-Daoudi, Rachid
    Alaoui, Altaf
    Ettaki, Badia
    Zerouaoui, Jamal
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 24 (06): : 392 - 400
  • [9] Data Center Predictions using MATLAB Machine Learning Toolbox
    Levy, Moises
    Raviv, Daniel
    Baker, Justin
    2019 IEEE 9TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE (CCWC), 2019, : 458 - 464
  • [10] Predictions and uncertainty estimates of reactor pressure vessel steel embrittlement using Machine learning
    Jacobs, Ryan
    Yamamoto, Takuya
    Odette, G. Robert
    Morgan, Dane
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2023, 236