An Examination of Dispositional Trust in Human and Autonomous System Interactions

被引:4
作者
Ferronato, Priscilla [1 ]
Bashir, Masooda [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Illinois Informat Inst, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Sch Informat Sci, Champaign, IL USA
来源
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION. HUMAN VALUES AND QUALITY OF LIFE, HCI 2020, PT III | 2020年 / 12183卷
关键词
Trust; Autonomous systems; Personality; Cultural orientation; AUTOMATION; PERSONALITY; MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; ATTITUDES; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-49065-2_30
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The rapid advancement of technology has changed the human and AS interactions, blurring the boundaries of what must be a human or automation action. The successfully implementation of humanin-the-loop is essential for the new relationship between humans and AS, in which control is shared and a team-mate collaboration arises. We believe that only through the best understanding of human factors and individual differences it will be possible to work towards the formation and calibration of trust in human and AS interactions. Therefore, this study conducted an online questionnaire to investigate the influence of personality traits, culture orientation, and individual differences on dispositional trust, as an effort to map out humans' baseline trust in autonomous systems. We found that while some factors presented significant relation with trust in autonomous systems when analyzed as an isolated variable, such as agreeableness trait, they do not have significant results when investigated concomitantly to other factors. Thus, we were able to identify that some individual differences - cultural values, extrovertion trait, and age - presented stronger influence on the dispositional trust in automation. Thus, our study provides valuable information about human factors that mediate trust, which supports the optimization and improvement of the overall interaction between humans and autonomous systems.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 435
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The role of propensity to trust and the five factor model across the trust process [J].
Alarcon, Gene M. ;
Lyons, Joseph B. ;
Christensen, James C. ;
Bowers, Margaret A. ;
Klosterman, Samantha L. ;
Capiola, August .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2018, 75 :69-82
[2]   Personality development: Stability and change [J].
Caspi, A ;
Roberts, BW ;
Shiner, RL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 56 :453-484
[3]  
Caspi A., 1993, PSYCHOL INQ, V4, P247, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI0404_1, 10.1207/s15327965pli04041, DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI04041]
[4]  
Chien S.-Y., 2016, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society - Annual Meeting, V60, P841, DOI DOI 10.1177/1541931213601192
[5]  
Costa P. T., 1992, PERSONALITY INDIVIDU, V13, P653, DOI [10.1016/0191-8869, DOI 10.1016/0191-8869, 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I, DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I]
[6]   Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess pedestrian receptivity toward fully autonomous vehicles [J].
Deb, Shuchisnigdha ;
Strawderman, Lesley ;
Carruth, Daniel W. ;
DuBien, Janice ;
Smith, Brian ;
Garrison, Teena M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 84 :178-195
[7]   Drivers' attitudes toward imperfect distraction mitigation strategies [J].
Donmez, Birsen ;
Boyle, Linda Ng ;
Lee, John D. ;
McGehee, Daniel V. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2006, 9 (06) :387-398
[8]   The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality [J].
Donnellan, M. Brent ;
Oswald, Frederick L. ;
Baird, Brendan M. ;
Lucas, Richard E. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2006, 18 (02) :192-203
[9]  
Driggs-Campbell K, 2015, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P1654, DOI 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139410
[10]   The role of trust in automation reliance [J].
Dzindolet, MT ;
Peterson, SA ;
Pomranky, RA ;
Pierce, LG ;
Beck, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2003, 58 (06) :697-718