The opportunity for partner industry knowledge sharing within audit offices and audit quality

被引:0
作者
Michas, Paul N. [1 ]
Russomanno, Dan [1 ]
Zhao, Meiling [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Eller Coll Management, Dhaliwal Reidy Sch Accountancy, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sch Accountancy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Audit offices; Audit partners; Audit quality; Industry knowledge and specialization; Knowledge sharing; PCAOB form AP; D8; M41; M42; BIG; 4; NONAUDIT SERVICES; SPECIALIZATION; EXPERTISE; LEVEL; INFORMATION; FIRM; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-025-09872-w
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We conjecture that a greater opportunity for audit partners to share personal industry knowledge with each other within audit offices is associated with higher audit quality. Using Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Form AP data, we analyze each partner's client portfolio and construct sharing measures. First, we find extant measures of an audit office's industry market share, industry portfolio share, and industry diversity are quite noisy in inferring our sharing measures. Next, we perform multivariate analyses and find negative associations between the opportunity to share industry knowledge and both restatements and absolute abnormal accruals. Further, we find this association varies cross-sectionally with other important auditor and client characteristics. Taken together, our evidence is consistent with a positive association between the opportunity for partners to share their industry knowledge with each other and audit quality.
引用
收藏
页数:52
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [1] ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
  • [2] Alvesson M., 2004, Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780199259342.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199259342.001.0001]
  • [3] American Institute of Certified Public Accountant (AICPA), 2020, A firm's system of quality control
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, Staff Guidance, Form AP, Auditor Reporting of Certain Audit Participants and Related Voluntary Audit Report Disclosure Under AS 3103, Reports on Audit Financial Statements
  • [5] Heterogeneity in expertise in a credence goods setting: evidence from audit partners
    Aobdia, Daniel
    Siddiqui, Saad
    Vinelli, Andres
    [J]. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2021, 26 (02) : 693 - 729
  • [6] Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections
    Aobdia, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2019, 67 (01) : 144 - 174
  • [7] The Impact of Audit Committee Information Technology Expertise on the Reliability and Timeliness of Financial Reporting
    Ashraf, Musaib
    Michas, Paul N.
    Russomanno, Dan
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 95 (05) : 23 - 56
  • [8] The Validity of Auditor Industry Specialization Measures
    Audousset-Coulier, Sophie
    Jeny, Anne
    Jiang, Like
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2016, 35 (01): : 139 - 161
  • [9] Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status
    Badolato, Patrick G.
    Donelson, Dain C.
    Ege, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2014, 58 (2-3) : 208 - 230
  • [10] Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality
    Balsam, S
    Krishnan, J
    Yang, JS
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2003, 22 (02): : 71 - 97