Proton dose calculation with transformer: Transforming spot map to dose

被引:0
作者
Tang, Xueyan [1 ]
Tseung, Hok Wan Chan [1 ]
Pepin, Mark D. [1 ]
Johnson, Jed E. [1 ]
Moseley, Doug J. [1 ]
Routman, David M. [1 ]
Qian, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
deep learning; dose calculation; proton Spot Map; proton therapy; transformer; THERAPY; GPU;
D O I
10.1002/mp.17794
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundConventional proton dose calculation methods are either time- and resource-intensive, like Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, or they sacrifice accuracy, as seen with analytical methods. This trade-off between computational efficiency and accuracy highlights the need for improved dose calculation approaches in clinical settings.PurposeThis study aims to develop a deep-learning-based model that calculates dose-to-water (DW) and dose-to-medium (DM) using patient anatomy and proton spot map (PSM), achieving approaching MC-level accuracy with significantly reduced computation time. Additionally, the study seeks to generalize the model to different treatment sites using transfer learning.MethodsA SwinUNetr model was developed using 259 four-field prostate proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans to calculate patient-specific DW and DM distributions from CT and projected PSM (PPSM). The PPSM was created by projecting PSM into the CT scans using spot coordinates, stopping power ratio, beam divergence, and water-equivalent thickness. Fine-tuning was then performed for the central nervous system (CNS) site using 84 CNS plans. The model's accuracy was evaluated against MC simulation benchmarks using mean absolute error (MAE), gamma analysis (2% local dose difference, 2-mm distance-to-agreement, 10% low dose threshold), and relevant clinical indices on the test dataset.ResultsThe trained model achieved a single-field dose calculation time of 0.07 s on a Nvidia-A100 GPU, over 100 times faster than MC simulators. For the prostate site, the best-performing model showed an average MAE of 0.26 +/- 0.17 Gy and a gamma index of 92.2% +/- 3.1% in dose regions above 10% of the maximum dose for DW calculations, and an MAE of 0.30 +/- 0.19 Gy with a gamma index of 89.7% +/- 3.9% for DM calculations. After transfer learning for CNS plans, the model achieved an MAE of 0.49 +/- 0.24 Gy and a gamma index of 90.1% +/- 2.7% for DW computations, and an MAE of 0.47 +/- 0.25 Gy with a gamma index of 85.4% +/- 7.1% for DM computations.ConclusionsThe SwinUNetr model provides an efficient and accurate method for computing dose distributions in proton therapy. It also opens the possibility of reverse-engineering PSM from DW, potentially speeding up treatment planning while maintaining accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Online daily adaptive proton therapy
    Albertini, Francesca
    Matter, Michael
    Nenoff, Lena
    Zhang, Ye
    Lomax, Antony
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1107)
  • [2] Proton therapy in clinical practice: Current clinical evidence
    Brada, Michael
    Pijls-Johannesma, Madelon
    De Ruysscher, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (08) : 965 - 970
  • [3] Cao Hu, 2023, Computer Vision - ECCV 2022 Workshops: Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (13803), P205, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-25066-8_9
  • [4] Sub-second pencil beam dose calculation on GPU for adaptive proton therapy
    da Silva, Joakim
    Ansorge, Richard
    Jena, Rajesh
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (12) : 4777 - 4795
  • [5] Design of a 3D patient-specific collision avoidance virtual framework for half-gantry proton therapy system
    Dougherty, Jingjing M.
    Whitaker, Thomas J.
    Mundy, Daniel W.
    Tryggestad, Erik J.
    Beltran, Chris J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (02):
  • [6] Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning
    Fracchiolla, F.
    Lorentini, S.
    Widesott, L.
    Schwarz, M.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (21) : 8601 - 8619
  • [7] GPU-based fast pencil beam algorithm for proton therapy
    Fujimoto, Rintaro
    Kurihara, Tsuneya
    Nagamine, Yoshihiko
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (05) : 1319 - 1328
  • [8] Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
    He, Kaiming
    Zhang, Xiangyu
    Ren, Shaoqing
    Sun, Jian
    [J]. 2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, : 770 - 778
  • [9] Factors influencing the accuracy of beam range estimation in proton therapy using prompt gamma emission
    Janssen, F. M. F. C.
    Landry, G.
    Lopes, P. Cambraia
    Dedes, G.
    Smeets, J.
    Schaart, D. R.
    Parodi, K.
    Verhaegen, F.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (15) : 4427 - 4441
  • [10] Denoising proton therapy Monte Carlo dose distributions in multiple tumor sites: A comparative neural networks architecture study
    Javaid, Umair
    Souris, Kevin
    Huang, Sheng
    Lee, John A.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 89 : 93 - 103