A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tourniquet Pressures in Upper Limb Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Chan, Kayen [1 ]
Jaibaji, Rawan [1 ]
Barker, Eleanor [2 ]
Talwar, Cyrus [3 ]
Pang, Calver [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp, Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge CB2 0QC, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Med Lib, Cambridge CB2 0SP, England
[3] Frimley Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Wrexham Pk Hosp, Slough SL2 4HL, England
[4] UCL, Fac Med Sci, Dept Surg Biotechnol, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
upper limb surgery; tourniquet pressures; meta-analysis; hand surgery; UPPER EXTREMITY; WIDE TOURNIQUETS; INFLATION; PAIN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm14061938
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Tourniquet pressures used in upper limb surgery are commonly standardized at 250 mmHg. These higher tourniquet pressures have been associated with an increased risk of complications, such as neural compression injury and soft tissue damage. However, there has been limited consensus as to the use of lower tourniquet pressures and their efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the current evidence for the use of lower tourniquet pressures in upper limb surgery, comparing them to the standard tourniquet pressures of 250 mmHg and, in some cases, 300 mmHg. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024511501). The primary outcome was the adequacy and quality of the bloodless field achieved at lower pressures. Secondary outcomes were assessed when reported, including the operative time, pain, and complications. Methods: The databases Medline (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), Cochrane, Web of Science (Core Collection) and Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, and ISRCTN registry were searched from inception to January 2025. The inclusion criteria included patients undergoing upper limb surgery using regional or general anesthetic with the use of a pneumatic tourniquet. A total of 1994 studies were identified, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria for review and 8 studies were used in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I and RoB-2 tools. Results: The sample size was 1427 patients with a mean age of 46.8 years. All studies showed a bloodless surgical field at lower tourniquet occlusion pressures. The meta-analysis showed the overall mean tourniquet inflation pressure, estimated using a random effects model, to be 169.3 mmHg with a 95% confidence interval of 144.9-193.6. However, the heterogeneity in the reported results is significant (p < 0.0001) and is a limitation to this review. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the benefit of the use of a lower tourniquet pressure (below the standard 250 mmHg) to produce an adequate surgical field and influence procedural outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tourniquet use in lower limb fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martin Præstegaard
    Elin Beisvåg
    Julie Ladeby Erichsen
    Michael Brix
    Bjarke Viberg
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2019, 29 : 175 - 181
  • [2] Tourniquet use in lower limb fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Praestegaard, Martin
    Beisvag, Elin
    Erichsen, Julie Ladeby
    Brix, Michael
    Viberg, Bjarke
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01): : 175 - 181
  • [3] The risks associated with tourniquet use in lower limb trauma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muhamed M. Farhan-Alanie
    Fatema Dhaif
    Alex Trompeter
    Martin Underwood
    Joyce Yeung
    Nick Parsons
    Andy Metcalfe
    Peter D. H. Wall
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2021, 31 : 967 - 979
  • [4] The risks associated with tourniquet use in lower limb trauma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Farhan-Alanie, Muhamed M.
    Dhaif, Fatema
    Trompeter, Alex
    Underwood, Martin
    Yeung, Joyce
    Parsons, Nick
    Metcalfe, Andy
    Wall, Peter D. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 31 (05): : 967 - 979
  • [5] Should tourniquets be used in upper limb surgery ? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Smith, Toby O.
    Hing, Caroline B.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2009, 75 (03): : 289 - 296
  • [6] Complications and side effects of Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) in upper limb surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jad Lawand
    Ashraf Hantouly
    Fadi Bouri
    Mohammad Muneer
    Abdulaziz Farooq
    Elisabet Hagert
    International Orthopaedics, 2024, 48 : 1257 - 1269
  • [7] Complications and side effects of Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) in upper limb surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lawand, Jad
    Hantouly, Ashraf
    Bouri, Fadi
    Muneer, Mohammad
    Farooq, Abdulaziz
    Hagert, Elisabet
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 48 (05) : 1257 - 1269
  • [8] RE: Complications and side effects of Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) in upper limb surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Clough, Richard
    Jones, Samuel
    Hamilton, Alex Euan
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 48 (07) : 1929 - 1930
  • [9] Is a tourniquet beneficial in total knee replacement surgery? A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Smith, Toby O.
    Hing, Caroline B.
    KNEE, 2010, 17 (02): : 141 - 147
  • [10] Is It Better to Routinely Use Tourniquet for Knee Arthroscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wang, Jinyou
    Xu, Wennan
    Lv, Jiayin
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (09) : 866 - 874