Automated quantum system modeling with machine learning

被引:1
作者
Mukherjee, K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schachenmayer, J. [4 ,5 ]
Whitlock, S. [5 ,6 ]
Wuester, S. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res, Dept Phys, Bhopal 462066, Madhya Pradesh, India
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Homer L Dodge Dept Phys & Astron, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Ctr Quantum Res & Technol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[4] Univ Strasbourg, CESQ, ISIS, UMR 7006, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[5] CNRS, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[6] Univ Strasbourg, ISIS, UMR 7006, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[7] PlanQC GmbH, Lichtenbergstr 8, D-85748 Garching, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
machine learning; quantum tomography; open quantum systems & decoherence; quantum many-body systems; ENERGY-TRANSFER; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1088/2058-9565/ada79a
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Despite the complexity of quantum systems in the real world, models with just a few effective many-body states often suffice to describe their quantum dynamics, provided decoherence is accounted for. We show that a machine learning algorithm is able to construct such models, given a straightforward set of quantum dynamics measurements. The effective Hilbert space can be a black box, with variations of the coupling to just one accessible output state being sufficient to generate the required training data. We demonstrate through simulations of a Markovian open quantum system that a neural network can automatically detect the number N of effective states and the most relevant Hamiltonian terms and state-dephasing processes and rates. For systems with N <= 5 we find typical mean relative errors of predictions in the 10% range. With more advanced networks and larger training sets, it is conceivable that a future single software can provide the automated first stop solution to model building for an unknown device or system, complementing and validating the conventional approach based on physical insight into the system.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Applications of neural networks to the simulation of dynamics of open quantum systems [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Sayantan ;
Huang, Zhongkai ;
Sun, Kewei ;
Zhao, Yang .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 515 :272-278
[2]   Spectral density classification for environment spectroscopy [J].
Barr, J. ;
Zicari, G. ;
Ferraro, A. ;
Paternostro, M. .
MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 5 (01)
[3]   On learning Hamiltonian systems from data [J].
Bertalan, Tom ;
Dietrich, Felix ;
Mezic, Igor ;
Kevrekidis, Ioannis G. .
CHAOS, 2019, 29 (12)
[4]   A deep learning framework for quantitative analysis of actin microridges [J].
Bhavna, Rajasekaran ;
Sonawane, Mahendra .
NPJ SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 9 (01)
[5]   ARTIFICIAL PHOTOSYNTHESIS - QUANTUM CAPTURE AND ENERGY-STORAGE [J].
CALVIN, M .
PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 1983, 37 (03) :349-360
[6]   Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks [J].
Carleo, Giuseppe ;
Troyer, Matthias .
SCIENCE, 2017, 355 (6325) :602-605
[7]  
Chuang IL, 1997, J MOD OPTIC, V44, P2455, DOI 10.1080/095003497152609
[8]   Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems [J].
Engel, Gregory S. ;
Calhoun, Tessa R. ;
Read, Elizabeth L. ;
Ahn, Tae-Kyu ;
Mancal, Tomas ;
Cheng, Yuan-Chung ;
Blankenship, Robert E. ;
Fleming, Graham R. .
NATURE, 2007, 446 (7137) :782-786
[9]   Learning models of quantum systems from experiments [J].
Gentile, Antonio A. ;
Flynn, Brian ;
Knauer, Sebastian ;
Wiebe, Nathan ;
Paesani, Stefano ;
Granade, Christopher E. ;
Rarity, John G. ;
Santagati, Raffaele ;
Laing, Anthony .
NATURE PHYSICS, 2021, 17 (07) :837-+
[10]  
Guedes de Andrade M., 2022, arXiv