Membrane aerated biological reactors (MABRs) to enhance the biological treatment process at a WWTP

被引:0
作者
Campo, Giuseppe [1 ]
Cerutti, Alberto [1 ]
Zanetti, Mariachiara [1 ]
Ruffino, Barbara [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Environm Land & Infrastruct Engn, DIATI, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
关键词
Pure MABR; Simultaneous nitrification-denitrification; Energy efficiency; Oxygen transfer efficiency; Techno-economic assessment; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; BIOFILM REACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122921
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of climate neutrality, under the provision of the European Green Deal, will require great efforts to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to reduce and optimize their energy consumption. The utilization of membrane aerated biological reactors (MABRs) to renovate existing WWTPs could be an opportunity in this sense. In this study, the control of the flow at the outlet of a pure, open-end MABR was used as a strategy to minimize the oxygen consumption and obtain high oxygen transfer efficiencies (OTEs). OTE values of more than 80% were observed, which are not so common in the literature and are comparable to those obtained with a close-end configuration. High efficiencies (85%) were found for the removal of both COD and total nitrogen from samples of real wastewater. A techno-economic analysis, comparing a conventional activate sludge (CAS) plant with a MABR, both with a treatment capacity of 25,000 equivalent inhabitants (e.i.), found that the MABR only needed approx. 1/5 of the energy required by the CAS. A MABR plant could become a profitable investment, under a fixed return time of 5 years, compared to a CAS with a CAPEX of 123.7 k<euro>, if the overall cost of the cassettes was inferior to 237 k<euro>. A sensitivity analysis imposing a variation of +/- 50% on the input parameters (cost of blower, diffusers, electric energy, and opportunity cost of capital) demonstrated that the cost of electric energy had the highest impact on the maximum allowable value of the MABR investment, which was affected by +/- 26% with respect to the value calculated in the reference scenario.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) as alternative treatment for domestic sewage. Optimization of plant performance
    Farabegoli, G.
    Chiavola, A.
    Rolle, E.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2009, 171 (1-3) : 1126 - 1132
  • [42] Biological wastewater treatment process staring at new era
    Unno, H
    Tanji, Y
    Xing, XH
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2001, 32 (03): : 227 - 234
  • [43] Seasonal variation of bacterial community in biological aerated filter for ammonia removal in drinking water treatment
    Liu, Hongyuan
    Zhu, Liying
    Tian, Xiaohe
    Yin, Yeshi
    WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 123 : 668 - 677
  • [44] An investigation into a petrochemical effluent treatment using a membrane biological reactor
    Ahmadpour, Amin
    Bozorgian, Alireza
    Eslamimanesh, Ali
    Mohammadi, Amir H.
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (11) : 27705 - 27722
  • [45] Treatment of Munitions Decomposing Wastewater Using Membrane Biological Reactor
    Xue, Feng
    Zhang, Wulong
    Yan, Hongzhou
    Zhang, Zhihong
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, PTS 1-6, 2013, 726-731 : 2363 - +
  • [46] Considerations for Optimization of Biological Treatment Process for Small Wastewater Treatment Plant
    Staniloiu, Cristian
    Florescu, Constantin
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2014, 65 (04): : 502 - 505
  • [47] Treatment of oil-field produced water by combined process of Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR)-Biological Aerated Filter (BAF): a pilot study
    Su, Delin
    Cong, Li
    Wang, Jianlong
    Zhou, Ding
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2009, 38 (1-2) : 69 - 80
  • [48] Membrane Filtration as Post-Treatment of Rotating Biological Contactor for Wastewater Treatment
    Waqas, Sharjeel
    Bilad, Muhammad Roil
    Huda, Nurul
    Harun, Noorfidza Yub
    Md Nordin, Nik Abdul Hadi
    Shamsuddin, Norazanita
    Wibisono, Yusuf
    Khan, Asim Laeeq
    Roslan, Jumardi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [49] Biological Treatment, Advanced Oxidation and Membrane Separation for Landfill Leachate Treatment: A Review
    Kamal, Arailym
    Makhatova, Ardak
    Yergali, Bakzhan
    Baidullayeva, Aigerim
    Satayeva, Aliya
    Kim, Jong
    Inglezakis, Vassilis J.
    Poulopoulos, Stavros G.
    Arkhangelsky, Elizabeth
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [50] Nitrogen-removal efficiency in an upflow partially packed biological aerated filter (BAF) without backwashing process
    Biplob, Pramanik
    Fatihah, Suja
    Shahrom, Zain
    Ahmed, ElShafie
    JOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION, 2011, 1 (01): : 27 - 35