Optimal portfolio choice under kinked power utility

被引:0
作者
Pelsser, Antoon [1 ]
Yang, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Quantitat Econ, NETSPAR, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Benchmark-driven investment; inflation-indexed pension benefits; life-cycle investment; state-dependent utility; stochastic optimal control; C61; D15; D53; G4; G11; OPTIMAL INVESTMENT STRATEGIES; DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION; LOSS AVERSION;
D O I
10.1080/03461238.2025.2450387
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
We extend the kinked power utility function by allowing a different risk aversion level in the two parts contained in the utility function. We maximize the expected utility of the replacement ratio at retirement that is wealth at retirement to a stochastic benchmark, for plan members in a defined contribution pension plan in a complete market. We derive closed-form optimal solutions under risk aversion and loss aversion implied by the kinked power utility. We find that plan members under kinked power utility tend to de-risk around the reference level, which could lead to a great proportion of the replacement ratio at retirement being on the reference level, while a small variation in the proportion of the replacement ratio at retirement ending up in the left tail. When the reference level is set at 100%, and the market price for future pension premiums (the value of initial capital) is lower than that for the benchmark, a lower risk aversion level when the replacement ratio falls below the reference level, could lead to a significant increase in the proportion of the replacement ratio at retirement being not below the reference level.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Why stocks may disappoint
    Ang, A
    Bekaert, G
    Liu, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 76 (03) : 471 - 508
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1960, IRE Trans. Commun. Syst., DOI [DOI 10.1109/TCOM.1960.1097606, 10.1109/tcom.1960.1097606]
  • [3] Bai ZF, 2020, ASIA-PAC J FINANC ST, V49, P652
  • [4] The Unprecedented Stock Market Reaction to COVID-19
    Baker, Scott R.
    Bloom, Nicholas
    Davis, Steven J.
    Kost, Kyle
    Sammon, Marco
    Viratyosin, Tasaneeya
    [J]. REVIEW OF ASSET PRICING STUDIES, 2020, 10 (04) : 742 - 758
  • [5] MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE
    BENARTZI, S
    THALER, RH
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) : 73 - 92
  • [6] Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion
    Berkelaar, AB
    Kouwenberg, R
    Post, T
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2004, 86 (04) : 973 - 987
  • [7] Target-driven investing: Optimal investment strategies in defined contribution pension plans under loss aversion
    Blake, David
    Wright, Douglas
    Zhang, Yumeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2013, 37 (01) : 195 - 209
  • [8] Optimal management under stochastic interest rates: the case of a protected defined contribution pension fund
    Boulier, JF
    Huang, SJ
    Taillard, G
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2001, 28 (02) : 173 - 189
  • [9] Dynamic asset allocation under inflation
    Brennan, MJ
    Xia, YH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (03) : 1201 - 1238
  • [10] Risk aversion vs. individualism: what drives risk taking in household finance?
    Breuer, Wolfgang
    Riesener, Michael
    Salzmann, Astrid Juliane
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2014, 20 (05) : 446 - 462