The Impact of the Institutional Quality on the Development of Sustainable Innovation: A Multilevel Analysis

被引:1
作者
Ibrahimi, Agnese [1 ]
Krasniqi, Besnik [1 ]
Berisha, Gentrit [1 ]
Rexhepi, Gadaf [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Prishtina, Fac Econ, Pristina, Kosovo
[2] South East European Univ, Fac Business & Econ, Tetovo, North Macedonia
关键词
firm factors; institutional quality; multilevel analysis; sustainable innovation; SIZED ENTERPRISES; ECO-INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/bsd2.70065
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
What causes sustainable innovation has been the subject of recent academic and policy debate. This study examines whether the relationship between firm characteristics and sustainable innovation differs in European and non-European countries with different institutional contexts. Drawing on institutional theory and leveraging data from the 2020 Eurobarometer survey involving 15,000 interviews in 36 European and non-European countries, multilevel econometric analysis of firms in these countries reveals a robust connection between sustainable innovation and firm-specific factors and institutional quality. We combine the firm-level data from Eurobarometer 2020 with multiple sources of country-level data to measure the impact of institutional quality on -sustainable innovation. Using a multilevel logistic regression model the findings indicate that small and medium-sized enterprises tend to develop more sustainable innovations, and countries with superior institutional quality and institutional trust foster an environment conducive to sustainable innovation. The paper concludes with implications for theory and policy, suggesting how governments can influence the growth and development of sustainable innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Barriers to green innovation initiatives among manufacturers: the Malaysian case [J].
Abdullah, Mirza ;
Zailani, Suhaiza ;
Iranmanesh, Mohammad ;
Jayaraman, K. .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 10 (04) :683-709
[2]   Sustainability-oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review [J].
Adams, Richard ;
Jeanrenaud, Sally ;
Bessant, John ;
Denyer, David ;
Overy, Patrick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2016, 18 (02) :180-205
[3]  
Aghion P., 2009, Bruegel Policy Brief, V7
[4]   Corporate governance and green innovation [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Bennedsen, Morten .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 75 :54-72
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, CHANGING COURSE GLOB
[6]  
Asgary N. H., 2024, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Sustainable Growth: Theory, Policy, and Practice, V2nd, DOI [10.4324/9781003405740, DOI 10.4324/9781003405740]
[7]   The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality [J].
Ashbaugh-Skaife, Hollis ;
Collins, Daniel W. ;
Kinney, William R., Jr. ;
LaFond, Ryan .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2008, 83 (01) :217-250
[8]   INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY: NEW MODELS AND PROPOSITIONS [J].
Barbieri, Jose Carlos ;
Gouveia de Vasconcelos, Isabella Freitas ;
Andreassi, Tales ;
de Vasconcelos, Flavio Carvalho .
RAE-REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS, 2010, 50 (02) :146-154
[9]   Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda [J].
Boons, Frank ;
Luedeke-Freund, Florian .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 45 :9-19
[10]   Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview [J].
Boons, Frank ;
Montalvo, Carlos ;
Quist, Jaco ;
Wagner, Marcus .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 45 :1-8