A prospective study of methylated ctDNA in patients undergoing treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Raunkilde, Louise [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Andersen, Rikke Fredslund [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Thomsen, Caroline Brenner [1 ,2 ]
Hansen, Torben Frostrup [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jensen, Lars Henrik [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Southern Denmark, Vejle Hosp, Dept Oncol, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
[2] Vejle Hosp, Danish Colorectal Canc Ctr South, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[4] Univ Hosp Southern Denmark, Vejle Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem & Immunol, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
来源
EJSO | 2025年 / 51卷 / 05期
关键词
Metastatic colorectal cancer; circulating tumor DNA; DNA methylation; Liver metastases; Loco-regional treatment; CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA; CELL-FREE DNA; CHEMOTHERAPY; GUIDELINE; DIAGNOSIS; RESECTION; PLASMA; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109586
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Decision regarding local treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is a multidisciplinary assessment, and liver intervention should be performed when the metastases are deemed resectable. There is no standard biomarker to aid neither this decision nor the postoperative treatment decisions. The present prospective, observational study aimed to investigate the potential clinical utility of a combined tumor-specific and organ-specific methylated circulating DNA assay in the perioperative setting of CRLM. Material and methods: The study included 56 cases with CRLM. Blood samples were drawn preoperatively and postoperatively. Multiplex methylation analysis of the markers NPY, KANK1, and GAL3ST3 (meth-ctDNA) was performed using droplet digital PCR. Results: The assay detected preoperative and postoperative meth-ctDNA in 37 % and 46 % of patients, respectively. Patients with negative preoperative meth-ctDNA had a longer median PFS compared to those with positive preoperative meth-ctDNA (HR = 2.2, 95 % CI 1.2-3.9, p G 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, preoperative negative meth-ctDNA was identified as a strong independent predictor of PFS (HR = 3.3, 95 % CI 1.5-7.2, p G 0.01). Similarly, patients with negative postoperative meth-ctDNA had longer median PFS (HR = 3.0, 95 % CI = 1.6-5.6, p G 0.001) and OS (HR = 4.1, 95 % CI 1.9-9.1, p G 0.001) compared to those with positive postoperative meth-ctDNA. Conclusion: Preoperative meth-ctDNA may serve as an important biomarker to inform the multidisciplinary assessment and treatment planning of CRLM. Negative meth-ctDNA may indicate the optimal timing for liver intervention, whereas positive meth-ctDNA may indicate initiation or re-orientation of chemotherapy, or immediate local intervention. Our results confirm postoperative negative meth-ctDNA as a strong prognostic marker of survival.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Molecular KRAS ctDNA Predicts Metastases and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Leiting, Jennifer L.
    Alva-Ruiz, Roberto
    Yonkus, Jennifer A.
    Abdelrahman, Amro M.
    Lynch, Isaac T.
    Carlson, Danielle M.
    Carr, Ryan M.
    Salomao, Diva R.
    Mcwilliams, Robert R.
    Starlinger, Patrick P.
    Thiels, Cornelius A.
    Grotz, Travis E.
    Warner, Susanne G.
    Cleary, Sean P.
    Kendrick, Michael L.
    Smoot, Rory L.
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Truty, Mark J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, : 4453 - 4463
  • [42] Evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Patients with Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Liver Resection
    Campagnaro, Tommaso
    Poletto, Edoardo
    Tarchi, Paola
    Rattizzato, Simone
    Verlato, Giuseppe
    Conci, Simone
    Pedrazzani, Corrado
    De Manzini, Nicolo
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Ruzzenente, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (10) : 2114 - 2125
  • [43] Natural history of liver metastases from colorectal cancer
    Luna-Perez, P
    Rodriguez-Coria, DF
    Arroyo, B
    Gonzalez-Macouzet, J
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1998, 29 (04): : 319 - 324
  • [44] FLT-PET for early response evaluation of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: a prospective study
    Mogensen, Marie Benzon
    Loft, Annika
    Aznar, Marianne
    Axelsen, Thomas
    Vainer, Ben
    Osterlind, Kell
    Kjaer, Andreas
    EJNMMI RESEARCH, 2017, 7
  • [45] Effect of high ligation on survival of patients undergoing surgery for primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases
    Matsui, S.
    Okabayashi, K.
    Hasegawa, H.
    Tsuruta, M.
    Shigeta, K.
    Ishida, T.
    Yamada, T.
    Kondo, T.
    Yamauchi, S.
    Sugihara, K.
    Kitagawa, Y.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (03): : 508 - 515
  • [46] Optimal treatment sequence in colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases
    Kolbinger, Fiona R.
    Kirchberg, Johanna
    Weitz, Juergen
    Fritzmann, Johannes
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2022, 44 (04) : 235 - 243
  • [47] Validation of Prognostic Scoring Systems for Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
    Reissfelder, Christoph
    Rahbari, Nuh N.
    Koch, Moritz
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Pfeilschifter, Isabel
    Waltert, Anke
    Mueller, Sascha A.
    Schemmer, Peter
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Weitz, Juergen
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (12) : 3279 - 3288
  • [48] Prognostic Impact of Circulating Methylated Homeobox A9 DNA in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
    Faaborg, Louise
    Andersen, Rikke Fredslund
    Waldstrom, Marianne
    Henriksen, Jon Roikjaer
    Adimi, Parvin
    Jakobsen, Anders
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [49] Regional lymph node involvement in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases
    Nanji, S.
    Tsang, M. E.
    Wei, X.
    Booth, C. M.
    EJSO, 2017, 43 (02): : 322 - 329
  • [50] Prognostic value of thrombocytosis in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases
    Pedrazzani, C.
    Turri, G.
    Mantovani, G.
    Conti, C.
    Ziello, R.
    Conci, S.
    Campagnaro, T.
    Ruzzenente, A.
    Guglielmi, A.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 21 (12) : 1644 - 1653