Prediction of photovoltaic panel cell temperatures: Application of empirical and machine learning models

被引:1
作者
Bayrak, Fatih [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Siirt University, Siirt
关键词
Correlation; Machine learning; Photovoltaic; Temperature distribution;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2025.135764
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, 25 different empirical models predicting the cell temperatures of PV panels were statistically analyzed and predictions were made using machine learning models. As a result of the correlation analysis, a strong positive correlation was found between the power output (Pm) of PV panels and solar radiation (Is) (PV1: r = 0.93, PV2: r = 0.94), indicating that photovoltaic energy conversion directly depends on solar radiation. In the analyses using error metrics (MAE and RMSE), the performances of wind speed dependent (MW) and independent (M) models were compared. However, since error metrics alone are not sufficient to assess the statistical significance and reliability of the models, t-test and confidence interval analyses were applied. The M5 model in the PV1 panel and the M1 model in the PV2 panel provided the closest predictions to the actual values. When MW models are analyzed, MW1 model for PV1 and MW13 model for PV2 produced the most accurate predictions. Within the scope of machine learning methods, different regression types such as Linear Regression, Non-Linear Regression, Decision Tree Regression and Support Vector Regression were evaluated and their prediction performances were compared. Among the Decision Tree based models, Extra Trees was one of the prominent models with R2 = 0.960 for PV1 and R2 = 0.974 for PV2 in the test phase. © 2025 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Selimefendigil F., Bayrak F., Oztop H.F., Experimental analysis and dynamic modeling of a photovoltaic module with porous fins, Renew Energy, 125, pp. 193-205, (2018)
[2]  
Hasan M.A., Sumathy K., Photovoltaic thermal module concepts and their performance analysis : a review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 14, pp. 1845-1859, (2010)
[3]  
Rahman M.M., Hasanuzzaman M., Rahim N.A., Effects of operational conditions on the energy ef fi ciency of photovoltaic modules operating in Malaysia, J Clean Prod, 143, pp. 912-924, (2017)
[4]  
Bayrak F., Oztop H.F., Effects of static and dynamic shading on thermodynamic and electrical performance for photovoltaic panels, Appl Therm Eng, 169, (2020)
[5]  
Govindasamy D., Daniel F., Kumar A., Performance enhancement of photovoltaic system using composite phase change materials, Energy, 288, (2024)
[6]  
Diouf M.C., Faye M., Thiam A., Ndiaye A., Sambou V., Modeling of the photovoltaic module operating temperature for various weather conditions in the tropical region, fluids dyn, Mater Process, 18, pp. 1275-1284, (2022)
[7]  
Segado P.M., Carretero J., Sidrach-de-cardona M., Models to predict the operating temperature of different photovoltaic modules in outdoor conditions, Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl, 23, pp. 1267-1282, (2015)
[8]  
Santos L.D.O., Carvalho P., Filho C., Photovoltaic cell operating temperature models : a review of correlations and parameters, IEEE J Photovoltaics, 12, pp. 179-190, (2022)
[9]  
Jakhrani A.Q., Othman A.K., Samo S.R., Comparison of solar photovoltaic module temperature models, World Appl Sci J, 14, pp. 1-8, (2011)
[10]  
Mattei M., Notton G., Cristofari C., Muselli M., Poggi P., Calculation of the polycrystalline PV module temperature using a simple method of energy balance, Renew Energy, 31, pp. 553-567, (2006)