FRONT block: a cadaveric study of a dual-plane injection block targeting femoral rami and obturator nerve trunk for anterior hip joint analgesia

被引:0
|
作者
Jessen, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Bjorn, Siska [2 ]
Hoermann, Romed [3 ]
Honis, Hanne-Rose [3 ]
Bendtsen, Thomas Fichtner [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Reg Hosp Horsens, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, PeriSCOP, Horsens, Central Denmark, Denmark
[2] Univ Aarhus, Dept Clin Med, Fac Hlth, Aarhus, Central Denmark, Denmark
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Anat Histol & Embryol, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Acute Pain; Nerve Block; Pain; Postoperative; Ultrasonography; Lower Extremity; FASCIA ILIACA; INNERVATION; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1136/rapm-2024-106272
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background The quest for a single nerve block to anesthetize all anterior hip articular nerve branches has long been a challenge for anesthetists, particularly in targeting the obturator nerve (ON). The FRONT block (Femoral Rami Obturator Nerve Trunk) is a newly developed dual-injection technique providing comprehensive anesthetic coverage of the anterior hip joint by targeting both the sensory femoral rami and the ON trunk.Methods 15 intact cadaveric sides from eight embalmed cadavers were dissected after FRONT block administration with one injection and two dye deposits in the iliopsoas plane and in the subpectineal compartment under dynamic ultrasonography. The primary outcome was dye spread to the sensory hip articular branches of the femoral nerve (FN) and the ON trunk evaluated during the gross anatomical dissection. Secondary outcomes included identifying landmarks for accurate injection of dye and measuring the distance from the needle trajectory to the femoral and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerves (LFCN).Results In 86.7% of cadaver sides, the FRONT block successfully covered both the sensory femoral rami and the ON trunk. The injection was performed 6.7 cm (SD 1.6) distal to the anterior superior iliac spine with a medial deviation of 1.8 cm (SD 2.1). The average distance from the needle trajectory to the FN was 0.8 cm (SD 0.4) and 3.7 (SD 2.1) cm to the LFCN.Conclusion The FRONT block offers reliable coverage of the anterior hip joint and capsule. Proficiency in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is important during clinical applications.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] A randomized clinical trial comparing different combination of peripheral nerve blocks for intraoperative analgesia in patients on antithrombotic drugs undergoing hip fracture surgery: pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus femoral and obturator nerve block
    Gargano, Francesca
    Migliorelli, Sabrina
    Pascarella, Giuseppe
    Costa, Fabio
    Strumia, Alessandro
    Bellezze, Alice
    Ruggiero, Alessandro
    Carassiti, Massimiliano
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024,
  • [2] Surgeon-performed pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach: a cadaveric study
    Kitcharanant, Nitchanant
    Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee
    Wangtapun, Pakawat
    Kantakam, Perada
    Maikong, Naraporn
    Mahakkanukrauh, Pasuk
    Tran, De Q.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (06) : 359 - 363
  • [3] A Practical Analgesia Approach to Fragility Hip Fracture: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Cohort Study on Femoral Nerve Block
    Li, Jinlei
    Dai, Feng
    Chang, Daniel
    Harmon, Emily
    Ibe, Izuchukwu
    Sukumar, Nitin
    Halaszynski, Thomas M.
    Rubin, Lee E.
    O'Connor, Mary, I
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2019, 33 (04) : 175 - 179
  • [4] A randomized controlled study of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG block) plus lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block vs patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative analgesia after hip replacement surgery
    Tran, Van Dang
    Hung, Nguyen Do
    Quang, Nguyen Xuan
    Nguyen, Tu Huu
    Tran, Duc Viet
    Vu, Hoang Phuong
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 28 (02) : 324 - 328
  • [5] Effect of pectineus muscle plane block versus femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia and early recovery after knee surgery: a randomised controlled trial study protocol
    Wang, Qian
    Men, Xin
    Xue, Yan
    Qin, Xia-rong
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (07): : 1 - 7
  • [6] Implementation of the Obturator Nerve Block into a Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Based Analgesia Protocol for Hip Arthroscopy: Retrospective Pre-Post Study
    Lee, Seounghun
    Hwang, Jung-Mo
    Lee, Sangmin
    Eom, Hongsik
    Oh, Chahyun
    Chung, Woosuk
    Ko, Young-Kwon
    Lee, Wonhyung
    Hong, Boohwi
    Hwang, Deuk-Soo
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (04):
  • [7] Comparison of continuous femoral nerve block, caudal epidural block, and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in pain control after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study
    Nishio, Shoji
    Fukunishi, Shigeo
    Juichi, Miura
    Sahoko, Koyanagi
    Fujihara, Yuki
    Fukui, Tomokazu
    Yoshiya, Shinichi
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2014, 6 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [8] Continuous Versus Single-Injection Sciatic Nerve Block Added to Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study
    Sato, Keita
    Adachi, Takehiko
    Shirai, Naoto
    Naoi, Noriko
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2014, 39 (03) : 225 - 229
  • [9] Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulator Guided Pectoral Nerve Block-1 and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Desai, Devyani J.
    Jyothi, Velmayil Murugesan Ananda
    Pathak, Ruchi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [10] Single-injection femoral nerve block with 0.25% ropivacaine or 0.25% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement or anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    de Lima e Souza, Rodrigo
    Correa, Claudio Henrique
    Henriques, Mauricio Delage
    de Oliveira, Christiano Barbosa
    Nunes, Tarcizo Afonso
    Gomez, Renato Santiago
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2008, 20 (07) : 521 - 527