A Monte Carlo-based algorithm for the quickest path flow network reliability problem

被引:1
作者
Huang, Cheng-Fu [1 ]
机构
[1] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Business Adm, Taichung 40724, Taiwan
关键词
Supply chain resilience; Computer systems; Network reliability; Quickest path (QP); Multi-state flow network (MSFN); Monte Carlo simulation; MINIMAL PATHS; SYSTEM RELIABILITY; TIME THRESHOLD; BUDGET; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-024-06377-8
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The importance of supply chain resilience has been highlighted in recent years, particularly during events such as wars and pandemics. Supply chain resilience is typically defined as the ability of a system to either return to its original state or evolve to a new, more advantageous state following a disruption. Therefore, it is imperative to evaluate the performance of real-world systems to mitigate risks or enhance capabilities. Computer systems are integral to supply chain operations and form the backbone of its overall functioning. To accurately reflect these computer systems, they are represented as Multi-State Flow Networks (MSFN). This paper evaluates the probability that an MSFN can transmit a given amount of demand through a minimal path (MP) connecting the source and terminal within a fixed time. This specific computational issue, referred to as the quickest path (QP) flow network reliability problem, is classified as NP-hard. Alternatively, the Monte Carlo simulation is developed to estimate the QP network reliability problem. The proposed Monte Carlo-based algorithm involves the random generation of a capacity vector representing the current state of the network. The generated capacity is then evaluated to determine whether the given amount of demand can be satisfied within the given time constraint. This evaluation takes into account the transmission times associated with all MP. To demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed Monte Carlo-based algorithm, extensive tests are conducted on a substantial practical network and parallel MSFN. In particular, the proposed Monte Carlo-based algorithm quickly provides precise solutions to the QP flow network reliability problem, even in situations characterized by a significant number of MP and arcs, numbering in the hundreds.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   An Improved Method for Reliability Evaluation of Two-Terminal Multistate Networks Based on State Space Decomposition [J].
Bai, Guanghan ;
Liu, Tao ;
Zhang, Yun-an ;
Tao, Junyong .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2021, 70 (03) :1084-1095
[2]   An improved algorithm for finding all minimal paths in a network [J].
Bai, Guanghan ;
Tian, Zhigang ;
Zuo, Ming J. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 150 :1-10
[3]   Ordering Heuristics for Reliability Evaluation of Multistate Networks [J].
Bai, Guanghan ;
Zuo, Ming J. ;
Tian, Zhigang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2015, 64 (03) :1015-1023
[4]   Algorithms for the quickest path problem and the reliable quickest path problem [J].
Herminia I. Calvete ;
Lourdes del-Pozo ;
José A. Iranzo .
Computational Management Science, 2012, 9 (2) :255-272
[5]   The quickest path problem with interval lead times [J].
Calvete, HI .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (03) :383-395
[6]   Efficient Estimation of Stochastic Flow Network Reliability [J].
Cancela, Hector ;
Murray, Leslie ;
Rubino, Gerardo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2019, 68 (03) :954-970
[7]   Simulation approaches for multi-state network reliability estimation: Practical applications [J].
Chang, Ping-Chen .
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2022, 115
[8]   MC-based simulation approach for two-terminal multi-state network reliability evaluation without knowing d-MCs [J].
Chang, Ping-Chen .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 220
[9]   ON THE QUICKEST PATH PROBLEM [J].
CHEN, GH ;
HUNG, YC .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1993, 46 (03) :125-128
[10]   Search for All Minimal Paths in a General Large Flow Network [J].
Chen, Shin-Guang ;
Lin, Yi-Kuei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2012, 61 (04) :949-956