Implementation of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke: aprocess evaluation using a mixed-methods approach

被引:0
作者
Prick, J. C. M. [1 ,2 ]
Engelhardt, E. G. [1 ]
Rotgerink, F. K. Lansink [1 ]
Deijle, I. A. [3 ]
van Schaik, S. M. [2 ]
Garvelink, M. M. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Dahmen, R. [7 ]
Brouwers, P. J. A. M. [8 ]
van Uden, I. W. M. [9 ]
van der Wees, P. J. [5 ,6 ]
Van den Berg-vos, R. M. [2 ,10 ]
van Uden-Kraan, C. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Santeon, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] OLVG, Dept Neurol, Jan Tooropstr 164, NL-1061 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] OLVG, Dept Qual & Improvement, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Value Based Healthcare, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept IQ Hlth, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Amsterdam Rehabil Res Ctr Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Med Spectrum Twente, Dept Neurol, Enschede, Netherlands
[9] Catharina Hosp, Dept Neurol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[10] Amsterdam UMC, Dept Neurol, Locat AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Stroke; Discharge planning; Shared decision-making; Patient decision aid; Implementation; CARE; DESTINATION; REHABILITATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2025.108716
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To promote shared decision-making (SDM) during discharge planning of patients with stroke, a patient decision aid (PtDA) was implemented in seven Dutch hospitals. This mixed-methods process evaluation assessed: 1) PtDA use, 2) the SDM process, 3) facilitators and barriers influencing health care professional (HCP) adoption of the PtDA, and 4) HCP experiences with the PtDA. Methods: Rates of PtDA use were derived from hospital registries and PtDA log data. SDM levels in consultations were quantitatively assessed using OPTION-5 (score range 0-100); the SDM process was analyzed qualitatively. Facilitators and barriers were identified via the MIDI questionnaire. HCP experiences were explored through interviews. Results: PtDA use varied across hospitals, with 10-96 % of patients receiving it and 27-100 % of those ultimately using it. OPTION-5 scores were low in both pre-implementation (n = 68, median:0, Q1-Q3:0-0) and postimplementation consultations (n = 49, median:0, Q1-Q3:0-15). Barriers included lack of whole-team engagement and limited recognition of PtDA benefits. Frequent PtDA use was associated with HCP confidence and selfefficacy in SDM. Conclusions: Successful PtDA implementation in stroke care requires whole-team engagement, emphasis on PtDA benefits, and enhancing HCP confidence and self-efficacy in SDM. Practice implications: Highlighting positive SDM outcomes and patient benefits may encourage HCPs to adopt the PtDA.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Evaluation of the Implementation of the Dutch Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid including Personalized Risk Estimates in the SHOUT-BC Study: A Mixed Methods Approach [J].
Ankersmid, Jet W. ;
Engelhardt, Ellen G. ;
Rotgerink, Fleur K. Lansink ;
The, Regina ;
Strobbe, Luc J. A. ;
Drossaert, Constance H. C. ;
Siesling, Sabine ;
van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F. .
CANCERS, 2024, 16 (07)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Qual Res Psychol, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238]
[3]   Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care [J].
Armstrong, Melissa J. .
STROKE AND VASCULAR NEUROLOGY, 2017, 2 (02) :84-87
[4]   The psychometric properties of Observer OPTION5, an observer measure of shared decision making [J].
Barr, Paul J. ;
O'Malley, Alistair James ;
Tsulukidze, Maka ;
Gionfriddo, Michael R. ;
Montori, Victor ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (08) :970-976
[5]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[6]   Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument [J].
Couet, Nicolas ;
Desroches, Sophie ;
Robitaille, Hubert ;
Vaillancourt, Hugues ;
Leblanc, Annie ;
Turcotte, Stephane ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Legare, France .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (04) :542-561
[7]   Adoption and implementation of a web-based self-management application "Oncokompas" in routine cancer care: a national pilot study [J].
de Wit, L. Matthijs ;
van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F. ;
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. ;
Melissant, Heleen C. ;
Fleuren, Margot A. H. ;
Cuijpers, Pim ;
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (08) :2911-2920
[8]   Patients' preferred and perceived decision-making roles, and observed patient involvement in videotaped encounters with medical specialists [J].
Driever, Ellen M. ;
Stiggelbout, Anne M. ;
Brand, Paul L. P. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (08) :2702-2707
[9]   "Many miles to go ... ": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Scholl, Isabelle ;
Tietbohl, Caroline ;
Mann, Mala ;
Edwards, Adrian G. K. ;
Clay, Catharine ;
Legare, France ;
van der Weijden, Trudy ;
Lewis, Carmen L. ;
Wexler, Richard M. ;
Frosch, Dominick L. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
[10]   Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Frosch, Dominick ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Joseph-Williams, Natalie ;
Lloyd, Amy ;
Kinnersley, Paul ;
Cording, Emma ;
Tomson, Dave ;
Dodd, Carole ;
Rollnick, Stephen ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Barry, Michael .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (10) :1361-1367