Reoperation following Cesarean Birth: An Analysis of Incidence, Indications, and Procedures Using a National Surgical Database

被引:0
|
作者
Burns, Luke P. [1 ]
Triebwasser, Jourdan E. [2 ]
Hong, Christopher X. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago Med, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
cesarean birth; current procedural terminology (CPT); dilation and curettage; hysterectomy; international classification of diseases (ICD); laparotomy; NSQIP; postoperative complications; postpartum hemorrhage; reoperation; relaparotomy; RE-LAPAROTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; DELIVERY; RELAPAROTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; HEMORRHAGE; SECTION;
D O I
10.1055/a-2542-9318
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to determine the incidence of reoperation after uncomplicated cesarean birth, describe the types of procedures and indications for reoperation, and identify risk factors associated with reoperation using a national surgical database. Study Design A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, encompassing data from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. A total of 43,492 patients who underwent cesarean birth were included. Patients who underwent concurrent nongynecologic procedures or hysterectomies were excluded. The primary outcomes measured were the incidence of unplanned reoperation within 30 days of cesarean birth, types of reoperative procedures, indications for reoperation, and associated risk factors. Statistical analyses included Student's t -test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, chi-squared test, and multivariable logistic regression. Results Out of 43,492 cesarean deliveries, 397 (0.9%) required unplanned reoperation. Significant risk factors for reoperation included smoking (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-1.56), hypertension (aOR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.27-2.62), bleeding disorders (aOR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.15-3.89), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class > 3 (aOR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.29-3.84), and concurrent myomectomy (aOR: 4.39, 95% CI: 1.06-18.2). The most common indications for reoperation were postpartum hemorrhage (47%), wound disruption or infection (18%), and hematoma or hemoperitoneum (14%). The most frequently performed reoperative procedures were exploratory laparotomy without hysterectomy (27%), uterine curettage (23%), and wound debridement or drainage (22%). Conclusion Reoperation following cesarean birth is a relatively uncommon but significant event, occurring in 0.9% of cases. Key risk factors include smoking, hypertension, bleeding disorders, ASA class > 3, and concurrent myomectomy. This study provides comprehensive data on the clinical characteristics and indications for reoperation following cesarean birth in a diverse, multi-institutional US cohort. The findings highlight the need for enhanced perioperative monitoring and targeted interventions for high-risk patients to improve maternal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re-exploration following caesarean birth: a prospective national case-control study using the United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) data collection system
    Bhatia, Kailash
    Columb, Malachy
    Knight, Marian
    Vause, Sarah
    ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 79 (11) : 1191 - 1200
  • [2] Reoperation following Adult Tonsillectomy: Review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Brant, Jason A.
    Bur, Andres M.
    Chai, Raymond
    Hatten, Kyle
    Nicolli, Elizabeth A.
    Fischer, John P.
    Cannady, Steven B.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2016, 154 (05) : 779 - 784
  • [3] Incidence of Acute Complications Following Surgery for Syndactyly and Polydactyly: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database from 2012 to 2014
    McQuillan, Thomas J.
    Hawkins, Jessica E.
    Ladd, Amy L.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 42 (09): : 749.e1 - 749.e7
  • [4] Risk factors for unexpected readmission and reoperation following open procedures for shoulder instability: a national database study of 1,942 cases
    Tarazi, John M.
    Partan, Matthew J.
    Daley, Alton
    Klein, Brandon
    Bartlett, Luke
    Cohn, Randy M.
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2023, 26 (03): : 252 - 259
  • [5] Incisional surgical site infection following cesarean section: A national retrospective cohort study
    Saeed, Khalid B. M.
    Corcoran, Paul
    Greene, Richard A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 240 : 256 - 260
  • [6] Rates and Predictors of Readmission Following Body Contouring Procedures: An Analysis of 5100 Patients From The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
    Vieira, Brittany L.
    Dorfman, Robert
    Turin, Sergey
    Gutowski, Karol A.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2017, 37 (08) : 917 - 926
  • [7] Analysis of the unplanned reoperation following surgical treatment of pulmonary tumor
    Mei, Long-Yong
    Feng, Yong-Geng
    Tao, Shao-Lin
    Jiang, Bin
    Dai, Fu-Qiang
    Zhou, Jing-Hai
    Shen, Cheng
    Guo, Wei
    Tan, Qun-You
    Deng, Bo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [8] Analysis of the unplanned reoperation following surgical treatment of pulmonary tumor
    Long-Yong Mei
    Yong-Geng Feng
    Shao-Lin Tao
    Bin Jiang
    Fu-Qiang Dai
    Jing-Hai Zhou
    Cheng Shen
    Wei Guo
    Qun-You Tan
    Bo Deng
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17
  • [9] Major postoperative complications following surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary database analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Erekson, Elisabeth
    Murchison, Regan L.
    Gerjevic, Kristen A.
    Meljen, Vivienne T.
    Strohbehn, Kris
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (05) : 608.e1 - 608.e17
  • [10] 30-Day Morbidity and Reoperation Following Midurethral Sling: Analysis of 8772 Cases Using a National Prospective Database
    Cohen, Andrew J.
    Packiam, Vignesh T.
    Nottingham, Charles U.
    Alberts, Blake D.
    Faris, Sarah F.
    Bales, Gregory T.
    UROLOGY, 2016, 95 : 72 - 78