Further calibration and validation of FLORIS with wind tunnel data

This paper compares the accuracy of four different FLORIS model implementations characterized by increasing levels of accounted physics. The predictions of each model were tested against experimental observations obtained from wind tunnel tests of a cluster of three scaled wind turbines. The experiments were conducted for a wide range of environmental conditions, and mainly with yawed turbines. The results showed a significant improvement in the accuracy of the base model by adding more details to the physical effects of the simulation, such as secondary steering and a heterogeneous flow field. It is also interesting to note that the FLORIS predictions become particularly accurate when considering inflow-dependent power losses in yaw-misaligned conditions.