Assessing the Understandability and Actionability of Education Materials for Agricultural Workers' Health

被引:0
|
作者
Nieuwsma, Julianna [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Joseph G. L. [2 ,3 ]
Bloss, Jamie E. [4 ]
Leprevost, Catherine E. [1 ]
Mendez, Israel M. [2 ]
Harwell, Emery L. [1 ]
Cofie, Leslie E. [2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Dept Appl Ecol, Raleigh, NC USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Coll Hlth & Human Performance, Dept Hlth Educ & Promot, 100 East Fifth St Stop 529, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Implementat Sci, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[4] East Carolina Univ, Laupus Hlth Sci Lib, Greenville, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Community of practice; consumer health information; health equity; health promotion; migrant workers; LATINO FARMWORKERS; LITERACY DEMAND; INFORMATION; READABILITY; SAFETY; COMMUNITIES; EXPOSURE; MIGRANT; ENGLISH; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/1059924X.2025.2474130
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectivesAgricultural health and safety educators, including community health workers and Extension agents, represent an important community of practice, connecting agricultural workers (i.e. migrant and seasonal farmworkers) to health information and care. We sought to identify and evaluate existing education resources available to educators for use in health education and outreach with farmworkers.MethodsThis study used a systemized search process to identify health education materials in English and Spanish used in the United States. Two independent coders coded each material for its understandability and actionability using the Patient Educational Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT). We report descriptive statistics by type of material, topic, and publication date of the material.ResultsWe identified farmworker health education materials (n = 602) from across the United States. The average understandability score was 86%, and the average actionability score was 76%. Materials were most commonly print material in the format of handouts, brochures, and posters. Some topic areas (e.g. musculoskeletal injuries) had considerably more resources than others (e.g. green tobacco).ConclusionThis research represents the first, to our knowledge, comprehensive assessment of health education materials for education and outreach to agricultural workers. While the average scores for understandability and actionability were high among materials, there is room to build a stronger set of resources in some topic areas and to modernize materials for electronic delivery. Using PEMAT tools can help the Extension and community health worker communities of practice improve the quality of materials they share with agricultural workers.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Quality, understandability and actionability of online patient education material about hypertension
    Ab Hamid, Mohd Ramadan
    Mohd Isamudin, Mastura
    Buhari, Siti Sabariah
    Khairul Ikram, Emmy Hainida
    NUTRITION & FOOD SCIENCE, 2021, 51 (04) : 621 - 632
  • [12] Understandability and Actionability of Audiovisual Patient Education on Epinephrine Auto-Injector
    Solak, Gurgun Tugce Vural
    Erkoc, Merve
    Solak, Yavuzalp
    ASTHMA ALLERGY IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01): : 58 - 66
  • [13] Assessing Vasectomy-Related Information on YouTube: An Analysis of the Quality, Understandability, and Actionability of Information
    Lang, Jacob J.
    Giffen, Zane
    Hong, Stephen
    Demeter, Jonathan
    El-Zawahry, Ahmed
    Sindhwani, Puneet
    Ekwenna, Obi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2022, 16 (02)
  • [14] Assessing the Functional Accessibility, Actionability, and Quality of Patient Education Materials from Canadian Cancer Agencies
    van Ballegooie, Courtney
    Heroux, Devon
    Hoang, Peter
    Garg, Sarthak
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (02) : 1439 - 1449
  • [15] Implementation of an organisation-wide health literacy approach to improve the understandability and actionability of patient information and education materials: A pre-post effectiveness study
    Mastroianni, Fiorina
    Chen, Yen-Chia
    Vellar, Lucia
    Cvejic, Erin
    Smith, Jessica Kathleen
    McCaffery, Kirsten J.
    Muscat, Danielle Marie
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (09) : 1656 - 1661
  • [16] Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): A new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information
    Shoemaker, Sarah J.
    Wolf, Michael S.
    Brach, Cindy
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 96 (03) : 395 - 403
  • [17] Evaluating the understandability and actionability of Japanese human papillomavirus vaccination educational materials on cervical cancer
    Yamada, Yuko
    Okuhara, Tsuyoshi
    Yokota, Rie
    Furukawa, Emi
    Okada, Hiroko
    Kiuchi, Takahiro
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 40 (02)
  • [18] Use of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict the Understandability of Health Education Materials: Development and Evaluation Study
    Ji, Meng
    Liu, Yanmeng
    Zhao, Mengdan
    Lyu, Ziqing
    Zhang, Boren
    Luo, Xin
    Li, Yanlin
    Zhong, Yin
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [19] Systematic Assessment Reveals Lack of Understandability for Prostate Biopsy Online Patient Education Materials
    Maciolek, Kimberly A.
    Jarrard, David F.
    Abel, E. Jason
    Best, Sara L.
    UROLOGY, 2017, 109 : 101 - 106
  • [20] Bladder Cancer Health Literacy: Assessing Readability of Online Patient Education Materials
    Powell, Lauren E.
    Cisu, Theodore, I
    Klausner, Adam P.
    BLADDER CANCER, 2021, 7 (01) : 91 - 98