Safety Integrity Level (SIL) evaluation of safety instrumented systems considering competing failure modes and subsystem priorities

被引:0
|
作者
Cheraghi, Morteza [1 ]
Taghipour, Sharareh [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Dept Mech Ind & Mechatron Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Safety Integrity Level (SIL); Safety Instrumented System (SIS); Safety Instrumented Function (SIF); Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD); Probability of Failing Safely (PFS); Competing failure modes; Subsystem priorities; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RELIABILITY; SUBJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2025.111025
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Safety Integrity Level (SIL) is a crucial measure of the safety performance of Safety Instrumented Systems (SISs), reflecting their ability to reduce risk. However, SIL analysis has often overlooked the impact of competing failure modes and subsystem priorities within SISs. This paper introduces a novel probabilistic model for evaluating the SIL of safety functions that incorporates these critical aspects. The model calculates the time-dependent Probability of (dangerous) Failure on Demand (PFD) and Probability of Failing Safely (PFS) at the component, subsystem, and system levels. The average PFD (PFDavg) and SIL are calculated considering both planned and unplanned proof tests. The proposed model is validated through Monte Carlo simulations and applied to a safety system designed to protect a process vessel from high-pressure hazards. A comparative analysis with existing models demonstrates that competing failure modes and subsystem priorities significantly influence PFD, PFS, PFDavg, and consequently SIL, especially in systems with longer proof test intervals and higher Safe Failure Fractions (SFFs).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Safety and operational integrity evaluation and design optimization of safety instrumented systems
    Innal, Fares
    Dutuit, Yves
    Chebila, Mourad
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 134 : 32 - 50
  • [2] Spurious activation and operational integrity evaluation of redundant safety instrumented systems
    Meng Qi
    Kan Yufeng
    Li Xun
    Wang Xiaoying
    Zhao Dongfeng
    Il, Moon
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 197
  • [3] Cost effective alternative in meeting the required Safety Integrity Level (SIL)
    Satur, Dale John
    Kim, Jonghun
    Bae, Mun-ki
    Kim, Seon-Yong
    Lee, Youngbae
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 40 : 406 - 418
  • [4] SAFETY INTEGRITY LEVEL (SIL) ALLOCATION ON MONORAIL ROLLING STOCK
    Li, James
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 JOINT RAIL CONFERENCE (JRC2021), 2021,
  • [5] Modeling for evaluation of safety instrumented systems with heterogeneous components
    Cai, Baoping
    Li, Wenchao
    Liu, Yiliu
    Shao, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Yanping
    Zhao, Yi
    Liu, Zengkai
    Ji, Renjie
    Liu, Yonghong
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 215
  • [6] Reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems subject to different demand modes
    Liu, Yiliu
    Rausand, Marvin
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2011, 24 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [7] Uncertainty analysis of common cause failure in safety instrumented systems
    Mechri, W.
    Simon, C.
    Ben Othman, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2011, 225 (O4) : 450 - 460
  • [8] The evaluation of safety instrumented systems - Tools to peer past the hype
    Gruhn, P
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 1996, 35 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [9] Design and Evaluation of safety Instrumented Systems: A Simplified and Enhanced Approach
    Gabriel, Angelito
    IEEE ACCESS, 2017, 5 : 3813 - 3823
  • [10] Fuzzy Reliability Assessment of Safety Instrumented Systems Accounting for Common Cause Failure
    Yu, Hongping
    Zhao, Yue
    Mo, Li
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 135371 - 135382