Retesting of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 status of invasive carcinoma of the breast after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Andrew H. S. [1 ]
Rakha, Emad A. [1 ]
Hodi, Zsolt [1 ]
Abbas, Areeg [1 ]
Ellis, Ian O. [1 ]
Chan, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Univ Hosp, Dept Histopathol, City Hosp Campus, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[2] Nottingham Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Nottingham, England
关键词
breast carcinoma; HER2; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; oestrogen receptor; progesterone receptor; NEEDLE CORE BIOPSY; HORMONE-RECEPTOR; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; CANCER; EXPRESSION; METAANALYSIS; BIOMARKERS; SPECIMENS; IMPACT; ER;
D O I
10.1111/his.15426
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
AimsThere is no consensus on whether oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status should be assessed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study assessed the frequency of changes in ER, PR and HER2 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Methods and resultsOf 353 patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2 treatment, receptors were assessed in 185 residual carcinomas. Eight per cent of carcinomas that were ER-negative in the core biopsy were ER-positive in the excision compared with 1.5% of controls. All were HER2-positive in the core biopsy and 23% were HER2-negative in the excision compared with 0% of controls. Controls were cases tested in the core biopsy and subsequent surgical resection with no neoadjuvant treatment. Of 589 patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, receptors were assessed in 495 residual carcinomas. Six per cent of carcinomas that were ER-negative in the core biopsy were ER-positive in the excision (mainly ER-low positive) compared with 1.5% of controls. All were HER2-negative in the core biopsy and 6% were HER2-positive in the excision (mainly immunohistochemistry score 2+ and HER2 gene amplified) compared with 2% of controls.ConclusionsNegative to positive changes in receptor status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are infrequent and the positive result in the excision is often weakly positive. These results imply that repeat assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery could influence the subsequent treatment in a small proportion of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients
    Verma, Adarsh
    Kar, Amrita Ghosh
    Meena, Ram Niwas
    Patne, S. C. U.
    Mishra, Shashi Prakash
    Khanna, Seema
    Khanna, Rahul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 83 (SUPPL 2) : 399 - 403
  • [42] Molecular subtype approximated by quantitative estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her2 can predict the prognosis of breast cancer
    Chen, Xiao-song
    Ma, Chuan-dong
    Wu, Jia-yi
    Yang, Wen-tao
    Lu, Hong-fen
    Wu, Jiong
    Lu, Jin-song
    Shao, Zhi-min
    Shen, Zhen-zhou
    Shen, Kun-wei
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2010, 96 (01): : 103 - 110
  • [43] HER2-low status and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 negative early breast cancer
    de Moura Leite, Luciana
    Cesca, Marcelle Goldner
    Tavares, Monique Celeste
    Santana, Debora Maciel
    Saldanha, Erick Figueiredo
    Guimaraes, Paula Tavares
    Sa, Daniella Dias Silva
    Simoes, Maria Fernanda Evangelista
    Viana, Rafael Lima
    Rocha, Francisca Giselle
    Loose, Simone Klog
    Silva, Sinara Figueiredo
    Pirolli, Rafaela
    Fogassa, Camilla Albina Zanco
    Mattos, Bruna Raphaeli Silva
    Campos, Fernando Augusto Batista
    Sanches, Solange Moraes
    de Lima, Vladmir Claudio Cordeiro
    Ponde, Noam Falbel
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 190 (01) : 155 - 163
  • [44] Breast Carcinoma, Receptor Status, and Her2 neu Overexpression Revisited
    Puvitha, R. D.
    Shifa, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 3 (10) : 52 - 58
  • [45] A comparison of immunohistochemical staining for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER-2 in breast core biopsies and subsequent excisions
    Wood, Benjamin
    Junckerstorff, Reimar
    Sterrett, Gregory
    Frost, Felicity
    Harvey, Jennet
    Robbins, Peter
    PATHOLOGY, 2007, 39 (04) : 391 - 395
  • [46] Assessment of hormonal receptor immunoexpression and Her2 status in invasive breast cancer after conservative and radical surgery
    Tenea-Cojan, Tiberiu Stefanita
    Macovei, Adrian
    Paun, Ion
    Costin, Andrei Ionut
    Georgescu, Claudia-Valentina
    Georgescu, Corneliu Cristian
    Vladu, Ionela Mihaela
    Ene, Cristina Gabriela
    Radu, Lucretiu
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2018, 59 (03) : 763 - 772
  • [47] HER2 expression in Brazilian patients with estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative breast carcinoma
    Ramalho, Susana
    Serra, Katia Piton
    Vassallo, Jose
    Soares, Fernando Augusto
    Pinto, Glauce Aparecida
    Teixeira, Luiz Carlos
    da Cunha, Isabela Werneck
    Derchain, Sophie F. M.
    de Souza, Gustavo
    ACTA HISTOCHEMICA, 2013, 115 (02) : 120 - 127
  • [48] Impact of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Low Status in Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer
    Alves, Fatima R.
    Gil, Lucia
    de Matos, Leonor Vasconcelos
    Baleiras, Ana
    Vasques, Carolina
    Neves, Maria Teresa
    Ferreira, Andre
    Fontes-Sousa, Mario
    Miranda, Helena
    Martins, Ana
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [49] Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer phenotype, ER/PR and HER2 expression - Implications for the practising oncologist
    Gahlaut, Renu
    Bennett, Aneliese
    Fatayer, Hiba
    Dall, Barbara J.
    Sharma, Nisha
    Velikova, Galina
    Perren, Tim
    Dodwell, David
    Lansdown, Mark
    Shaaban, Abeer M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 60 : 40 - 48
  • [50] Discordances in ER, PR and HER2 receptors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    van de Ven, S.
    Smit, V. T. H. B. M.
    Dekker, T. J. A.
    Nortier, J. W. R.
    Kroep, J. R.
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2011, 37 (06) : 422 - 430