Antimicrobial Prescription Practices and Stewardship in Washington State Small and Mixed Animal Veterinary Medicine

被引:1
|
作者
Cassel, Shannon [1 ,2 ]
Fenelon, Hannah T. [2 ]
Rott, Elizabeth [1 ]
Blazes, Libby [3 ]
Willess, Leah M. [1 ]
Baines, Anna E. [2 ]
Ramirez, Vickie [2 ]
Kauber, Kelly [4 ]
Rabinowitz, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Burbick, Claire R. [5 ]
Fuhrmeister, Erica R. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Ctr Hlth Res 1, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ USA
[4] Washington State Dept Hlth, Communicable Dis Epidemiol, Washington, DC USA
[5] Washington State Univ, Dept Vet Microbiol & Pathol, Washington Anim Dis Diagnost Lab, Pullman, WA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Civil & Environm Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
anti-bacterial agents/therapeutic use; antimicrobial stewardship; drug prescriptions/veterinary; surveys and questionnaires; veterinary medicine; ANTIBIOTIC USE; RESISTANCE; INFECTIONS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1111/zph.13187
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionJudicious antimicrobial use is essential for the continued treatment of infections in small and mixed animal veterinary medicine. To better support Washington (WA) State veterinarians in antimicrobial stewardship, we surveyed licensed small and mixed animal veterinarians and led group conversations regarding antimicrobial prescription practices.MethodsSurvey questions included demographic information, factors influencing prescription practices and clinical cases. Responses were summarised and logistic regressions were performed to identify factors associated with antibiotic treatment choices. Group conversations, led by a licensed veterinarian, focused on resource gaps for veterinarians, management of clinical scenarios and interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and breakpoints. A systematic qualitative analysis of conversation transcripts identified key themes such as common barriers to stewardship.ResultsAmong 53 responses to clinical scenarios, veterinarians selected the most appropriate treatment choice, according to a veterinary microbiologist, 62% of the time. Variability was observed in culture and susceptibility practices and antibiotic choices. Survey respondents reported an influence of the client ability to medicate (92%), considerations of resistance (91%), client finances (75%) and availability of antimicrobials (75%) on their prescription decisions. There were no significant associations between opinions about contributing factors to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) or guidelines used and treatment choices in clinical scenarios. Among 15 veterinarians interviewed in group conversations, a systematic qualitative analysis of conversation transcripts revealed key themes, including reliance on human medicine as a resource and a lack of support for veterinarians in interpreting MICs and breakpoints.ConclusionsThe variability in veterinary antibiotic treatment decisions in this study suggests a need for further dissemination of standardised antimicrobial stewardship resources for veterinarians. Client-related challenges and the cost of culture and susceptibility are major barriers to stewardship. To address these barriers, it is necessary to provide standardised, easy-to-access guidance for veterinarians in interpreting MICs and breakpoints, as well as develop antimicrobial use resources for clients.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 126
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Survey of veterinary antimicrobial prescribing practices, Washington State 2015
    Fowler, H.
    Davis, M. A.
    Perkins, A.
    Trufan, S.
    Joy, C.
    Buswell, M.
    McElwain, T. F.
    Moore, D.
    Worhle, R.
    Rabinowitz, P. M.
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2016, 179 (25) : 651 - +
  • [2] Antimicrobial Stewardship in Veterinary Medicine
    Lloyd, David H.
    Page, Stephen W.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2018, 6 (03):
  • [3] Antimicrobial Stewardship in Small Animal Veterinary Practice: From Theory to Practice
    Guardabassi, Luca
    Prescott, John F.
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2015, 45 (02) : 361 - +
  • [4] Antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine: a review of online resources
    Allerton, Fergus
    Russell, James
    JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2023, 5 (03):
  • [5] Advancing antimicrobial stewardship in companion animal veterinary medicine: a qualitative study on perceptions and solutions to a One Health problem
    Lagana, Danielle M.
    Taylor, Daniel D.
    Walter, Elaine J. Scallan
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 261 (08): : 1200 - 1207
  • [6] Change starts at home: summary of the 2023 inaugural Small Animal Antimicrobial Stewardship Workshop for US Veterinary Schools
    Fellman, Claire L.
    Janovyak, Emily
    Bollig, Emma R.
    DeStefano, Ian M.
    Diaz-Campos, Dubraska
    Granick, Jennifer L.
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 262 (11): : 1552 - 1558
  • [7] Qualitative study of factors associated with antimicrobial usage in seven small animal veterinary practices in the UK
    Mateus, Ana L. P.
    Brodbelt, David C.
    Barber, Nick
    Staerk, Katharina D. C.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2014, 117 (01) : 68 - 78
  • [8] Perceptions and Practices of Community Pharmacists towards Antimicrobial Stewardship in the State of Selangor, Malaysia
    Khan, Muhammad Umair
    Hassali, Mohamed Azmi Ahmad
    Ahmad, Akram
    Elkalmi, Ramadan Mohamed
    Zaidi, Syed Tabish Razi
    Dhingra, Sameer
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [9] Use of antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine and food animal production
    Schwarz, S
    Kehrenberg, C
    Walsh, TR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2001, 17 (06) : 431 - 437
  • [10] Antimicrobial practices among small animal veterinarians in Greece: a survey
    Valiakos, George
    Pavlidou, Eleni
    Zafeiridis, Christos
    Tsokana, Constantina N.
    Vilas, Victor J. Del Rio
    ONE HEALTH OUTLOOK, 2020, 2 (01):