Trends in Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Patients With Low-Surgical Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

被引:0
|
作者
Kazemian, Sina [1 ,2 ]
Fallahtafti, Parisa [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sharifi, Mohammad [2 ]
Mohammadi, Negin Sadat Hosseini [1 ,2 ]
Soleimani, Hamidreza [1 ,2 ]
Moghadam, Arman Soltani [2 ]
Karimi, Elaheh [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sattar, Yaser [5 ]
Jenab, Yaser [1 ,2 ]
Mehrani, Mehdi [1 ,2 ]
Hajizeinali, Alimohammad [2 ]
Iskander, Mina [6 ]
Sabet, Mehrshad Fathian [7 ]
Salehi, Negar [8 ]
Al-Azizi, Karim [9 ]
Hakim, Diaa [10 ]
Alam, Mahboob [11 ]
Hosseini, Kaveh [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Cardiac Primary Prevent Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Tehran Heart Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Cardiovasc Dis Res Inst, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[5] West Virginia Univ, Dept Cardiol, Morgantown, WV USA
[6] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med Cardiol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[7] McLaren Flint Michigan State Univ, McLaren Flint, Flint, MI USA
[8] Akron Gen Hosp, Cleveland Clin, Heart Vasc & Thorac Inst, Akron, OH USA
[9] Baylor Scott & White Heart Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Plano, TX USA
[10] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Cardiovasc Div, Boston, MA USA
[11] Texas Heart Inst, Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2024年 / 13卷 / 21期
关键词
aortic stenosis; low surgical risk; mortality; surgical aortic valve replacement; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; ONSET ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.124.036179
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Limited data exist on long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This meta-analysis aims to elucidate outcome trends following TAVR versus SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low-surgical risk. Methods and Results: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception until May 2024, to identify studies comparing TAVR versus SAVR in patients with low-surgical risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score <4%). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, stroke, disabling stroke, rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, aortic valve reintervention, permanent pacemaker implantation, and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Binary random-effects models were used to compare the risk of each outcome across various follow-up intervals and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias-2 tool. The meta-analysis included 6 randomized trials including 4682 patients. TAVR was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality than SAVR in the 30-day (hazard ratio [HR: 0.45] [95% CI: 0.26-0.77], I-2: 0%) and 30-day to 1-year (HR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.37-0.81], I-2: 16%) follow-ups. However, the risk of all-cause mortality was similar during >1-year follow-ups. TAVR was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular mortality, disabling stroke, rehospitalization, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and a higher risk of permanent pacemaker implantation compared with SAVR during the 30-day follow-up. Conclusions: TAVR was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality within the first year of post-procedural follow-up compared with SAVR. However, the risk of all-cause mortality was similar in >1-year follow-ups.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in low to intermediate surgical risk aortic stenosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Dengshen
    Mao, Xin
    Liu, Daxing
    Zhang, Jian
    Luo, Gang
    Luo, Liangliang
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (12) : 1414 - 1422
  • [2] Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Hofer, Felix
    Hengstenberg, Christian
    Goliasch, Georg
    Grygier, Marek
    Mascherbauer, Julia
    Siller-Matula, Jolanta M.
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 109 (06) : 761 - 775
  • [3] Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Felix Hofer
    Christian Hengstenberg
    Georg Goliasch
    Marek Grygier
    Julia Mascherbauer
    Jolanta M. Siller-Matula
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2020, 109 : 761 - 775
  • [4] Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Osman, Mohammed
    Abubakar, Hossam
    Subahi, Ahmed
    Chahine, Adam
    Ahmed, Sahar
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    Alkotob, Mohammad L.
    Hassan, Mustafa
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (10) : 838 - 842
  • [5] Meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk
    Witberg, Guy
    Landes, Uri
    Lador, Adi
    Yahav, Dafna
    Kornowski, Ran
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2019, 15 (12) : E1047 - +
  • [6] Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies
    Witberg, Guy
    Lador, Adi
    Yahav, Dafna
    Kornowski, Ran
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 92 (02) : 408 - 416
  • [7] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Low-Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Garg, Aakash
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Visveswaran, Gautam
    Agrawal, Sahil
    Sharma, Abhishek
    Garg, Lohit
    Mahata, Indrajeet
    Garg, Jalaj
    Singal, Dinesh
    Cohen, Marc
    Kostis, John B.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 29 (06): : 208 - 216
  • [8] Low-Risk Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Anantha-Narayanan, Mahesh
    Kandasamy, Vimalkumar Veerappan
    Reddy, Yogesh N., V
    Megaly, Michael
    Baskaran, Janani
    Pershad, Ashish
    Suri, Rakesh M.
    Garcia, Santiago
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (04) : 441 - 452
  • [9] Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low- and intermediate-risk patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ueshima, Daisuke
    Fovino, Luca Nai
    D'Amico, Gianpiero
    Brener, Sorin J.
    Esposito, Giovanni
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 34 (03) : 216 - 225
  • [10] Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in lower-risk and higher-risk patients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Ahmad, Yousif
    Howard, James P.
    Arnold, Ahran D.
    Madhavan, Mahesh V.
    Cook, Christopher M.
    Alu, Maria
    Mack, Michael J.
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Kapadia, Samir
    Thyregod, Hans Gustav Horsted
    Sondergaard, Lars
    Jorgensen, Troels Hojsgaard
    Toff, William D.
    Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
    Makkar, Raj R.
    Forrest, John K.
    Leon, Martin B.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44 (10) : 836 - 852