Assessment of diagnostic value of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Jian [1 ]
Xu, Guang [1 ]
Xiang, Lihua [1 ]
Guo, Lehang [1 ]
Wang, Shuai [1 ]
Dong, Lin [1 ]
Sun, Liping [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Ultrasound Res & Educ Inst, Dept Med Ultrasound Ctr Minimally Invas Treatment, 301,Yanchang Middle Rd, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
来源
OPEN MEDICINE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; targeted biopsy; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity; unilateral systematic biopsy; MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; TRUS BIOPSY; ACCURACY; MEN; PROMIS;
D O I
10.1515/med-2024-1048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This retrospective study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsy (TB) and unilateral systematic biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in 222 men with single magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] >= 3).Methods Patients underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/ultrasound fusion TB and 12-needle standard biopsy (SB) from September 2016 to June 2021. The study compared the diagnostic performance of TB + iSB (ipsilateral), TB + contralateral system biopsy (cSB) (contralateral), and TB alone for csPCa using the chi 2 test and analysis of variance.Results Among 126 patients with csPCa (ISUP >= 2), detection rates for TB + iSB, TB + cSB, and TB were 100, 98.90, and 100% for lesions, respectively. TB + iSB showed the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value. No significant differences in accuracy were found between TB + iSB and the gold standard for type 3 lesions (P = 1). For types 4-5, detection accuracy was comparable across methods (P = 0.314, P = 0.314, P = 0.153). TB had the highest positive needle count rate, with TB + iSB being second for type 3 lesions (4.08% vs 6.57%, P = 0.127).Conclusion TB + iSB improved csPCa detection rates and reduced biopsy numbers, making it a viable alternative to TB + SB for single MRI lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic Value of Finger-guided Prostate Nodule Biopsy Combined With Systemic Random Biopsy
    Chiang, I-Ni
    Chang, Shang-Jen
    Pu, Yeong-Shiau
    Huang, Kuo-How
    Yu, Hong-Jen
    Huang, Chao-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 108 (09) : 713 - 718
  • [42] Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative prostate biopsy: The current value of microscopic findings
    Morote, Juan
    Schwartzman, Ivan
    Borque, Angel
    Esteban, Luis M.
    Celma, Anna
    Roche, Sarai
    de Torres, Ines M.
    Mast, Richard
    Semidey, Maria E.
    Regis, Lucas
    Santamaria, Anna
    Planas, Jacques
    Trilla, Enrique
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (07) : 432.e11 - 432.e19
  • [43] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound targeted biopsy versus standard systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection: results of a prospective cohort study with 1024 patients
    Zhu Yunkai
    Chen Yaqing
    Jiang Jun
    Qi Tingyue
    Liu Weiyong
    Qu Yuehong
    Guan Wenbin
    Wang Lifeng
    Qi Jun
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 805 - 811
  • [44] Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: Improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    Mendhiratta, Neil
    Wysock, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [45] Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Targeted Biopsy to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer
    Hoffmann, Manuela A.
    Taymoorian, Kasra
    Ruf, Christian
    Gerhards, Arnd
    Leyendecker, Karlheinz
    Stein, Thomas
    Jakobs, Frank M.
    Schreckenberger, Mathias
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (12) : 6871 - 6877
  • [46] Comparison of Systematic, Targeted and Combined Prostate Biopsy: Our Clinical Outcomes
    Senoglu, Yusuf
    Taskiran, Arda Taskin
    Yuksel, Alpaslan
    Baba, Dursun
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2022, 21 (02): : 40 - 44
  • [47] MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men
    Tan, Teck Wei
    Png, Keng Siang
    Lee, Chau Hung
    Yuwono, Arianto
    Yeow, Yuyi
    Chong, Kian Tai
    Lee, Yee Mun
    Tan, Cher Heng
    Tan, Yung Khan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (11) : 1111 - 1116
  • [48] A PSMA PET/CT-based risk model for prediction of concordance between targeted biopsy and combined biopsy in detecting prostate cancer
    An, Chaoli
    Qiu, Xuefeng
    Liu, Beibei
    Song, Xiang
    Yang, Yu
    Shu, Jiaxin
    Fu, Yao
    Wang, Feng
    Zhao, Xiaozhi
    Guo, Hongqian
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [49] Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy The most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Enzinger, Benazir
    Pfitzinger, Paulo Leonardo
    Ebner, Benedikt
    Ivanova, Troya
    Volz, Yannic
    Apfelbeck, Maria
    Kazmierczak, Philipp
    Stief, Christian
    Chaloupka, Michael
    UROLOGIE, 2023, 62 (05): : 479 - 486
  • [50] A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Targeted Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Thangarasu, Mathisekaran
    Jayaprakash, Sanjay Prakash
    Selvaraj, Nivash
    Bafna, Sandeep
    Paul, Rajesh
    Mahesh, Chandranathan
    Jain, Nitesh
    Balakrishnan, Arunkumar
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 207 - 213