Assessment of diagnostic value of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Jian [1 ]
Xu, Guang [1 ]
Xiang, Lihua [1 ]
Guo, Lehang [1 ]
Wang, Shuai [1 ]
Dong, Lin [1 ]
Sun, Liping [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Ultrasound Res & Educ Inst, Dept Med Ultrasound Ctr Minimally Invas Treatment, 301,Yanchang Middle Rd, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
来源
OPEN MEDICINE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; targeted biopsy; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity; unilateral systematic biopsy; MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; TRUS BIOPSY; ACCURACY; MEN; PROMIS;
D O I
10.1515/med-2024-1048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This retrospective study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsy (TB) and unilateral systematic biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in 222 men with single magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] >= 3).Methods Patients underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/ultrasound fusion TB and 12-needle standard biopsy (SB) from September 2016 to June 2021. The study compared the diagnostic performance of TB + iSB (ipsilateral), TB + contralateral system biopsy (cSB) (contralateral), and TB alone for csPCa using the chi 2 test and analysis of variance.Results Among 126 patients with csPCa (ISUP >= 2), detection rates for TB + iSB, TB + cSB, and TB were 100, 98.90, and 100% for lesions, respectively. TB + iSB showed the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value. No significant differences in accuracy were found between TB + iSB and the gold standard for type 3 lesions (P = 1). For types 4-5, detection accuracy was comparable across methods (P = 0.314, P = 0.314, P = 0.153). TB had the highest positive needle count rate, with TB + iSB being second for type 3 lesions (4.08% vs 6.57%, P = 0.127).Conclusion TB + iSB improved csPCa detection rates and reduced biopsy numbers, making it a viable alternative to TB + SB for single MRI lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic Evidence Analysis for Comparison of MRI-targeted Biopsy versus systematic Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Prostate cancer
    Sigle, A.
    Jilg, C. A.
    Schmidt, S.
    Miernik, A.
    UROLOGE, 2020, 59 (02): : 185 - 188
  • [32] Targeted and Systematic Biopsy for Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer
    Chuang, R. J.
    Marks, L. S.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (03) : 144 - 148
  • [33] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Stabile, Armando
    Neves, Joana B.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Valerio, Massimo
    Shanmugabavan, Yaalini
    Clement, Keiran D.
    Sarkar, Debashis
    Philippou, Yiannis
    Thurtle, David
    Deeks, Jonathan
    Emberton, Mark
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Moore, Caroline M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (03) : 284 - 303
  • [34] Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naive Men
    Kim, Young Joo
    Huh, Jung Sik
    Park, Kyung Kgi
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (04) : 346 - 351
  • [35] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy May Enhance the Diagnostic Accuracy of Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Compared to Standard Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (03) : 438 - 450
  • [36] Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies
    Filson, Christopher P.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Lieu, Patricia
    Dorey, Frederick J.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) : 884 - 892
  • [37] New Diagnostic Model for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men With PIRADS 3
    Huang, Chen
    Qiu, Feng
    Jin, Di
    Wei, Xuedong
    Chen, Zongxin
    Wang, Ximing
    Zhao, Xiaojun
    Guo, Linchuan
    Pu, Jinxian
    Hou, Jianquan
    Huang, Yuhua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [38] Sextant Systematic Biopsy Versus Extended 12-Core Systematic Biopsy in Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer
    Chung, Jae Hoon
    Song, Wan
    Kang, Minyong
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong I. L.
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Park, Byung Kwan
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 39 (07)
  • [39] Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Young, Allen
    Collica, Sarah
    Srivastava, Arnav
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Partin, Alan W.
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (04) : 619 - 626
  • [40] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound targeted biopsy versus standard systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection: results of a prospective cohort study with 1024 patients
    Zhu Yunkai
    Chen Yaqing
    Jiang Jun
    Qi Tingyue
    Liu Weiyong
    Qu Yuehong
    Guan Wenbin
    Wang Lifeng
    Qi Jun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (05) : 805 - 811