Assessment of diagnostic value of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Jian [1 ]
Xu, Guang [1 ]
Xiang, Lihua [1 ]
Guo, Lehang [1 ]
Wang, Shuai [1 ]
Dong, Lin [1 ]
Sun, Liping [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Ultrasound Res & Educ Inst, Dept Med Ultrasound Ctr Minimally Invas Treatment, 301,Yanchang Middle Rd, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
来源
OPEN MEDICINE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; targeted biopsy; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity; unilateral systematic biopsy; MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; TRUS BIOPSY; ACCURACY; MEN; PROMIS;
D O I
10.1515/med-2024-1048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This retrospective study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsy (TB) and unilateral systematic biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in 222 men with single magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] >= 3).Methods Patients underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/ultrasound fusion TB and 12-needle standard biopsy (SB) from September 2016 to June 2021. The study compared the diagnostic performance of TB + iSB (ipsilateral), TB + contralateral system biopsy (cSB) (contralateral), and TB alone for csPCa using the chi 2 test and analysis of variance.Results Among 126 patients with csPCa (ISUP >= 2), detection rates for TB + iSB, TB + cSB, and TB were 100, 98.90, and 100% for lesions, respectively. TB + iSB showed the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value. No significant differences in accuracy were found between TB + iSB and the gold standard for type 3 lesions (P = 1). For types 4-5, detection accuracy was comparable across methods (P = 0.314, P = 0.314, P = 0.153). TB had the highest positive needle count rate, with TB + iSB being second for type 3 lesions (4.08% vs 6.57%, P = 0.127).Conclusion TB + iSB improved csPCa detection rates and reduced biopsy numbers, making it a viable alternative to TB + SB for single MRI lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Usefulness of MRI targeted prostate biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with low prostate-specific antigen levels
    Bang, Seokhwan
    Yu, Jiwoong
    Chung, Jae Hoon
    Song, Wan
    Kang, Minyong
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [22] Prostate cancer diagnostic by saturation randomized biopsy versus rigid targeted biopsy
    Defontaines, J.
    Salomon, L.
    Champy, C.
    Cholley, I.
    Chiaradia, M.
    de la Taille, A.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2017, 27 (16): : 1023 - 1030
  • [23] A prospective multi-center randomized comparative trial evaluating outcomes of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided 12-core systematic biopsy, mpMRI-targeted 12-core biopsy, and artificial intelligence ultrasound of prostate (AIUSP) 6-core targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis
    Wang, Xiao
    Xie, Yanqi
    Zheng, Xiangyi
    Liu, Ben
    Chen, Hong
    Li, Jiangfeng
    Ma, Xueyou
    Xiang, Jianjian
    Weng, Guobin
    Zhu, Weizhi
    Wang, Gang
    Fang, Ye
    Cheng, Hongtao
    Xie, Liping
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (03) : 653 - 662
  • [24] Diagnostic performance of prostate cancer antigen 3 and the Prostate Health Index in detecting overall and clinically significant prostate cancer in men at first biopsy: A meta-analysis
    Jia, Wei
    Wu, Bo
    Shao, Yuan
    Cao, Xiaoming
    Wang, Dongwen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 315 - 325
  • [25] Who Can Avoid Systematic Biopsy Without Missing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Who Undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy?
    Nakanishi, Yasukazu
    Ito, Masaya
    Fukushima, Iirushi
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Kataoka, Madoka
    Ikuta, Shuzo
    Sakamoto, Kazumasa
    Takemura, Kosuke
    Suzuki, Hiroaki
    Tobisu, Ken-ichi
    Koga, Fumitaka
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (03) : E664 - E671
  • [26] Targeted biopsy added to systematic biopsy improves cancer detection in prostate cancer screening
    Li, Peizi
    Ni, Pu
    Kombak, Faruk Erdem
    Wolters, Emily
    Haines, George Kenneth
    Si, Qiusheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2024, 17 (05): : 173 - 181
  • [27] Results of Targeted Biopsy in Men with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Classified Equivocal, Likely or Highly Likely to Be Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Venderink, Wulphert
    van Luijtelaar, Annemarijke
    Bomers, Joyce G. R.
    van der Leest, Marloes
    De Kaa, Christina Hulsbergen-van
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (03) : 353 - 360
  • [28] The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy
    Mannaerts, Christophe K.
    Kajtazovic, Mir
    Lodeizen, Olivia A. P.
    Gayet, Maudy
    Engelbrecht, Marc R. W.
    Jager, Gerrit J.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    de Reijke, Theo M.
    Beerlage, Harrie P.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (05) : 298.e1 - 298.e9
  • [29] Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy
    Morote, Juan
    Paesano, Nahuel
    Picola, Natalia
    Miro, Berta
    Abascal, Jose M.
    Servian, Pol
    Trilla, Enrique
    Mendez, Olga
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [30] Multiparametric MRI targeted prostate biopsy When omit systematic biopsy?
    Pepe, Pietro
    Pepe, Ludovica
    Fiorentino, Vincenzo
    Curduman, Mara
    Fraggetta, Filippo
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2024, 96 (04)