Assessment of diagnostic value of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Jian [1 ]
Xu, Guang [1 ]
Xiang, Lihua [1 ]
Guo, Lehang [1 ]
Wang, Shuai [1 ]
Dong, Lin [1 ]
Sun, Liping [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Ultrasound Res & Educ Inst, Dept Med Ultrasound Ctr Minimally Invas Treatment, 301,Yanchang Middle Rd, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
来源
OPEN MEDICINE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; targeted biopsy; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity; unilateral systematic biopsy; MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; TRUS BIOPSY; ACCURACY; MEN; PROMIS;
D O I
10.1515/med-2024-1048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This retrospective study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsy (TB) and unilateral systematic biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in 222 men with single magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] >= 3).Methods Patients underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/ultrasound fusion TB and 12-needle standard biopsy (SB) from September 2016 to June 2021. The study compared the diagnostic performance of TB + iSB (ipsilateral), TB + contralateral system biopsy (cSB) (contralateral), and TB alone for csPCa using the chi 2 test and analysis of variance.Results Among 126 patients with csPCa (ISUP >= 2), detection rates for TB + iSB, TB + cSB, and TB were 100, 98.90, and 100% for lesions, respectively. TB + iSB showed the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value. No significant differences in accuracy were found between TB + iSB and the gold standard for type 3 lesions (P = 1). For types 4-5, detection accuracy was comparable across methods (P = 0.314, P = 0.314, P = 0.153). TB had the highest positive needle count rate, with TB + iSB being second for type 3 lesions (4.08% vs 6.57%, P = 0.127).Conclusion TB + iSB improved csPCa detection rates and reduced biopsy numbers, making it a viable alternative to TB + SB for single MRI lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Influence of biopsy cores number performed with targeted prostate biopsy on the likelihood of a positive result in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer
    Zyryanov, A., V
    Gulin, G. A.
    Rubtsova, N. A.
    Mager, V. O.
    Putintsev, A. E.
    Kuznetsova, S. G.
    Kuznetsova, D. D.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2020, 16 (03): : 62 - 69
  • [12] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review
    Valerio, Massimo
    Donaldson, Ian
    Emberton, Mark
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Mozer, Pierre
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) : 8 - 19
  • [13] Value of cognitive fusion targeted and standard systematic transrectal prostate biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis
    Yu, Lu-Ping
    Du, Yi-Qing
    Sun, Yi-Ran
    Qin, Cai-Peng
    Yang, Wen-Bo
    Huang, Zi-Xiong
    Xu, Tao
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2024, 26 (05): : 479 - 483
  • [14] Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Manseck, A
    Froehner, M
    Oehlschlaeger, S
    Hakenberg, O
    Friedrich, K
    Theissig, F
    Wirth, MP
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2000, 65 (02) : 80 - 83
  • [15] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted Biopsy with Four Cores Versus Target Saturation Biopsy with Nine Cores in Transperineal Prostate Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Saner, Yasemin Melisa
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Weru, Vivienn
    Ladyzhensky, Boris
    Tschirdewahn, Stephan
    Puellen, Lukas
    Bonekamp, David
    Reis, Henning
    Krafft, Ulrich
    Hethorn, Jochen
    Kesch, Claudia
    Darr, Christopher
    Forsting, Michael
    Wetter, Axel
    Umutlu, Lale
    Haubold, Johannes
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (01): : 49 - 55
  • [16] Comparison of systematic and combined biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer
    Huang, Jin-Lun
    Huang, Da
    Chun, Tsun-Tsun
    Yao, Chi
    Zhan, Yong-Le
    Ruan, Xiao-Hao
    Lai, Terence Chun-Ting
    Tsang, Chiu-Fung
    Pang, Karl-Ho
    Ng, Ada Tsui-Lin
    Xu, Dan-Feng
    Ho, Brian Sze-Ho
    Na, Rong
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2024, 26 (05): : 517 - +
  • [17] A novel biopsy scheme for prostate cancer: targeted and regional systematic biopsy
    He, Yang
    Fan, Yu
    Song, Haitian
    Shen, Qi
    Ruan, Mingjian
    Chen, Yuke
    Li, Derun
    Li, Xueying
    Liu, Yi
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhang, Qian
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [18] Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Kim, Michelle M.
    Wu, Shulin
    Lin, Sharron X.
    Crotty, Rory K.
    Cornejo, Kristine M.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    Feldman, Adam S.
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (10) : 451.e9 - 451.e14
  • [19] Diagnostic Place Value of the multiparametric MRI with targeted Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients with PSA Increase and negative Stamping Biopsy for the Detection of clinically significant Prostate Carcinomas Correlation with the Gleason Score
    Hoffmann, Manuela A.
    Wieler, Helmut J.
    Jakobs, Frank M.
    Taymoorian, Kasra
    Gerhards, Arnd
    Miederer, Matthias
    Schreckenberger, Mathias
    NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 56 (04): : 147 - 155
  • [20] Detection of clinically significant cancer in the anterior prostate by transperineal biopsy
    Cowan, Tim
    Baker, Emily
    McCray, Gabriella
    Reeves, Fairleigh
    Houlihan, Kimberley
    Johns-Putra, Lydia
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 : 33 - 37