Portraits of socioeconomic inequality in special zones of social interest

被引:0
作者
Gerhard, Felipe [1 ]
De Paula, Thiago Matheus [1 ]
de Carvalho, Hermano Jose Batista [1 ]
Camara, Samuel Facanha [1 ]
de Souza, Lucas Lopes Ferreira [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Ceara UECE, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[2] Univ Fortaleza Unifor, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
来源
URBE-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GESTAO URBANA | 2024年 / 16卷
关键词
Inequality; Access to essential services; Poverty; Social Connections; ZEIS;
D O I
10.1590/2175-3369.016.e20230248
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
This study aims to analyze the portraits of socio-economic inequality in three Special Zones of Social Interest (ZEIS) in the years 2010 and 2019. Data, both primary (qualitative and quantitative) and secondary, were collected from three ZEIS located in Fortaleza-CE. To provide a comprehensive analysis of inequality, the study also investigated the physical, human, social, and environmental aspects within these ZEIS. The findings indicated that the absence of public services and the persistent poverty within study ZEIS contribute to the perpetuation of inequalities. Over the past decade, there has been a deterioration in social opportunities due to inadequate access to essential services, limited formal employment opportunities, and weakening social connections. Consequently, the vulnerability of ZEIS residents has been perpetuated, with women and individuals with lower levels of education being particularly affected. To bring about meaningful social changes, public policies targeting ZEIS must encompass various aspects and prioritize the pressing needs identified by the communities themselves. This integration of different spheres and social elements is crucial for promoting significant improvements in these areas.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Socioeconomic inequality undermines relationship quality in romantic relationships
    Cho, Minha
    Impett, Emily A.
    Campos, Belinda
    Chen, Serena
    Keltner, Dacher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2020, 37 (05) : 1722 - 1742
  • [32] Socioeconomic Inequality and Giftedness: Suppression and Distortion of High Ability
    Ambrose, Don
    [J]. ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2013, 35 (02): : 81 - 92
  • [33] Socioeconomic disparities and inequality of mass sports participation: Analysis from Chinese General Social Survey 2010-2018
    Dong, Haoyu
    Wang, Ying
    Li, Wen
    Dindin, Jennifer
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [34] THE POLITICAL DIMENSION OF SOCIAL INEQUALITY AND POVERTY (Comparative Experience)
    Lyublinsky, V. V.
    [J]. POLIS-POLITICHESKIYE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2015, (05): : 94 - 106
  • [35] Social capital, income inequality, and firearm violent crime
    Kennedy, BP
    Kawachi, I
    Prothrow-Stith, D
    Lochner, K
    Gupta, V
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 47 (01) : 7 - 17
  • [36] The Political Economy of Poverty and Social Inequality: The Case of Monteria
    Eliecer Ortega-Montes, Jorge
    Ninna Valencia-Jimenez, Nydia
    Restrepo-Valencia, Marleny
    [J]. CUADERNOS DE VIVIENDA Y URBANISMO, 2008, 1 (01): : 96 - 123
  • [37] ATTITUDES TOWARDS DEMOCRACY IN BULGARIA: THE IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL INEQUALITY
    Minkov, Zhivko
    [J]. ENGLISH STUDIES AT NBU, 2019, 5 (02): : 323 - 349
  • [38] Social Policy Perspectives on Economic Inequality in Wealthy Countries
    Giordono, Leanne S.
    Jones, Michael D.
    Rothwell, David W.
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2019, 47 : S96 - S118
  • [39] Urban inequality, social exclusion and schooling in Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Cameron, Stuart James
    [J]. COMPARE-A JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION, 2017, 47 (04) : 580 - 597
  • [40] Education, economic inequality and the promises of the social investment state
    Solga, Heike
    [J]. SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 12 (02) : 269 - 297