A Curricular Analysis of What Pre-Service Teachers Learn About Linguistic Diversity in the Induction Phase of Teacher Education

被引:0
作者
Boening, Caroline [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Deutsch Zweit & Fremdsprache, Univ Str 12, D-45141 Essen, Germany
来源
JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ONLINE-JERO | 2024年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
multilingualism; induction phase; teacher education; curriculum analysis; language learning;
D O I
10.31244/jero.2024.01.06
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the induction phase of teacher education in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany. It presents an examination of what pre- service teachers learn about multilingualism and language education and how this topic is implemented and conceptualized on a curricular level. Documents (N = 814) from regional teacher education institutions in NRW (Zentren fur schulpraktische Lehrerausbildung) were analyzed (using quantitative and qualitative content analysis) regarding the use of specific words within this semantic field. Results show that multilingualism can be regarded as a well-established topic in the curricula. Frequent use of terms such as 'multilingualism' (Mehrsprachigkeit; N = 335) indicates a positive approach towards the concept, yet it remains abstract and difficult to contextualize within the field. The analysis demonstrates that multilingualism is frequently used to describe the overall teaching situation in a classroom. However, it is rarely mentioned in the context of methods for language education. Instead, words such as 'technical language' (Fachsprache; N = 194) or 'linguistically responsive teaching' (sprachsensibel; N = 663) are frequently used. Overall, much of the wording seems to be based on the NRW curricular framework. With reference to scientific discourse and research surrounding multilingualism, the results show some similarities to curricular analysis of the teacher education program at universities in NRW.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 126
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Bach G., 2010, Bilingualer Unterricht. Grundlagen, Methoden, Praxis, Perspektiven, V5
[2]  
Baumann B., 2014, Sprachforderung und Deutsch als Zweitsprache an deutschen Schulen: Was leistet die Lehrerbildung?
[3]  
Becker-Mrotzek M., 2017, Sprachliche Bildung-Grundlagen und Handlungsfelder, P11, DOI DOI 10.31244/9783830983897
[4]  
Berger S., 2016, Journal fur International und Interkulturell Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft, V22, P150
[5]  
Berkel-Otto L, 2021, BILING EDUC BILING, V130, P82
[6]  
Boing M., 2022, Diversitatssensible Lehrer*innenbildung. Theoretische und praktische Erkundungen, P143
[7]  
Boning C., 2023, ON-Kolner Online Journal fur Lehrer*innenbil, V7, P262, DOI [10.18716/ojs/kON/2023.13, DOI 10.18716/OJS/KON/2023.13]
[8]  
Brandt H., 2021, Sprachliche Heterogenitat im gesellschaftswissenschaftlichen Unterricht. Herangehensweisen und Uberzeugungen von Lehrkraften in der Sekundarstufe I
[9]  
Budde J., 2017, Umgang mit Heterogenitat in Schule und Unterricht. Grundlagentheoretische Beitrage, empirische Befunde und didaktische Reflexionen, P13
[10]  
Busch B., 2021, Mehrsprachigkeit, V3, DOI [10.36198/9783838556529, DOI 10.36198/9783838556529]