Implementation of a Robotic Surgical Program With the Dexter Robotic Surgery System: Initial Experiences in Cholecystectomy

被引:0
作者
Hotz, Anne-Sophie [1 ]
Seeger, Nico [1 ]
Gantner, Lukas [1 ]
Grieder, Felix [1 ]
Breitenstein, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp Winterthur, Dept Visceral & Thorac Surg, Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
cholecystectomy; Dexter Robotic Surgery system; minimally invasive surgery; robot-assisted surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; STRESS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/wjs.12531
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe use of surgical robots in minimally invasive visceral surgery is increasing, with new platforms like the Dexter Robotic System. This study evaluated the implementation of Dexter in a general visceral surgery department, focusing on safety, performance, and surgeon stress in elective cholecystectomy.Materials and MethodsThree surgeons with varying laparoscopic and robotic experience performed robotic cholecystectomies with Dexter between December 2022 and June 2024. Perioperative outcomes and safety data were collected until 30 days post-surgery. Surgeons' stress load and physical discomfort were assessed using validated questionnaires (SMEQ, STAI, and LED).ResultsFifty-nine patients underwent elective gallbladder removal. Median age was 52 years (range 27-85) and BMI 26.3 kg/m2 (range 18.3-41.2). All surgeries were completed robotically without conversion to open surgery. There were no intraoperative complications or device deficiencies. Two cases were converted to laparoscopy due to patient anatomy and a liver tumor discovery. One postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo grade 3A) involved choledocholithiasis requiring ERCP. Median total operating time, docking time, and console use time were 60 min (IQR 50-78), 5 min (IQR 4-7), and 23 min (IQR 19-34), respectively. Operative times revealed a fast-learning experience, stabilizing after 10-15 cases. Surgeons reported high comfort (LED Median 3, IQR 0-6) and low stress (SMEQ median 10, IQR 10-26.25).ConclusionThe Dexter system was safely implemented in clinical practice, with efficient learning curve and low perceived stress, even for surgeons without prior robotic experience. Further studies are needed to determine whether Dexter offers advantages over conventional techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / 1227
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Trends of complications and innovative techniques' utilization for colectomies in the United States [J].
Abd El Aziz, Mohamed A. ;
Grass, Fabian ;
Behm, Kevin T. ;
Shawki, Sherief ;
D'Angelo, Anne-Lise ;
Mathis, Kellie L. ;
Larson, David W. .
UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (01) :101-110
[2]   National trends and outcomes of inpatient robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Aguayo, Esteban ;
Dobaria, Vishal ;
Nakhla, Morcos ;
Seo, Young-Ji ;
Hadaya, Joseph ;
Cho, Nam Yong ;
Sareh, Sohail ;
Sanaiha, Yas ;
Benharash, Peyman .
SURGERY, 2020, 168 (04) :625-630
[3]   Psychological and Physical Stress Among Experienced and Inexperienced Surgeons During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [J].
Andersen, Lars Peter Holst ;
Klein, Mads ;
Gogenur, Ismail ;
Rosenberg, Jacob .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (01) :73-78
[4]   The Imperial Stress Assessment Tool (ISAT): A Feasible, Reliable and Valid Approach to Measuring Stress in the Operating Room [J].
Arora, Sonal ;
Tierney, Tanya ;
Sevdalis, Nick ;
Aggarwal, Rajesh ;
Nestel, Debra ;
Woloshynowych, Maria ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Kneebone, Roger .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (08) :1756-1763
[5]   Evaluation status of current and emerging minimally invasive robotic surgical platforms [J].
Boal, M. ;
Di Girasole, C. Giovene ;
Tesfai, F. ;
Morrison, T. E. M. ;
Higgs, S. ;
Ahmad, J. ;
Arezzo, A. ;
Francis, N. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (02) :554-585
[6]   Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study [J].
Breitenstein, Stefan ;
Nocito, Antonio ;
Pithan, Milo ;
Held, Ulrike ;
Weber, Markus ;
Clavien, Pierre-Alain .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (06) :987-993
[7]   Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis [J].
Catchpole, Ken ;
Perkins, Colby ;
Bresee, Catherine ;
Solnik, M. Jonathon ;
Sherman, Benjamin ;
Fritch, John ;
Gross, Bruno ;
Jagannathan, Samantha ;
Hakami-Majd, Niv ;
Avenido, Raymund ;
Anger, Jennifer T. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (09) :3749-3761
[8]   Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy: Current status and future application [J].
Chandhok, Simran ;
Chao, Phillip ;
Koea, Jonathan ;
Srinivasa, Sanket .
LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 5 (03) :85-91
[9]   Proposed training pathway with initial experience to set up robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic service [J].
Farrugia, Alexia ;
Muhammad, Qazi Rahim ;
Ravichandran, Niranjan T. ;
Ali, Majid ;
Marangoni, Gabriele ;
Ahmad, Jawad .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (01) :65-71
[10]   Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial [J].
Grochola, Lukasz Filip ;
Soll, Christopher ;
Zehnder, Adrian ;
Wyss, Roland ;
Herzog, Pascal ;
Breitenstein, Stefan .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (05) :1482-1490