Would entitled people be more proactive at work? Examining contrasting mechanisms based on the proactive motivation model

被引:0
作者
Yang, Shipan [1 ,2 ]
Quan, Cheng [3 ]
Cai, Zijun [4 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest Univ, Res Inst Econ & Dev Western China, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Remin Univ China, Sch Lab & Human Resources, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Business Sch, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Psychological entitlement; Proactive work behavior; Need for uniqueness; Emotional exhaustion; Role-breadth self-efficacy; PSYCHOLOGICAL ENTITLEMENT; SELF-EFFICACY; ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT; BEHAVIOR; VOICE; CONSEQUENCES; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; NARCISSISM; UNIQUENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104609
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research has largely regarded psychological entitlement as detrimental to organizational effectiveness. In contrast, this study presents a more nuanced view by exploring its relationship with proactive work behavior. Drawing on the proactive motivation model, we propose that psychological entitlement influences proactive work behavior in both positive and negative ways, with need for uniqueness, role-breadth self-efficacy, and emotional exhaustion serving as mediators for the "reason to," "can do," and "energized to" states, respectively. Through a field study and an experiment, our results consistently showed that psychological entitlement had positive influences on proactive work behavior. Our study thus highlights that psychological entitlement should not be seen solely as problematic, sheds light on new mechanisms through which it influences work outcomes, and deepens our understanding of individual differences in proactive behavior at work.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] MTurk Research: Review and Recommendations
    Aguinis, Herman
    Villamor, Isabel
    Ramani, Ravi S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2021, 47 (04) : 823 - 837
  • [2] What works for you may not work for (Gen)Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation
    Anderson, Heather J.
    Baur, John E.
    Griffith, Jennifer A.
    Buckley, M. Ronald
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2017, 28 (01) : 245 - 260
  • [3] Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas
    Axtell, CM
    Holman, DJ
    Unsworth, KL
    Wall, TD
    Waterson, PE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 73 : 265 - 285
  • [4] Pro-self, prosocial, and pro-organizational foci of proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences
    Belschak, Frank D.
    Den Hartog, Deanne N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 83 (02) : 475 - 498
  • [5] GRANDIOSE NARCISSISM VERSUS VULNERABLE NARCISSISM IN THREATENING SITUATIONS: EMOTIONAL REACTIONS TO ACHIEVEMENT FAILURE AND INTERPERSONAL REJECTION
    Besser, Avi
    Priel, Beatriz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 29 (08) : 874 - 902
  • [6] Fuel of the Self-Starter: How Mood Relates to Proactive Goal Regulation
    Bindl, Uta K.
    Parker, Sharon K.
    Totterdell, Peter
    Hagger-Johnson, Gareth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (01) : 134 - 150
  • [7] The dynamics and dangers of entitlement
    Bishop, J
    Lane, RC
    [J]. PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 19 (04) : 739 - 758
  • [8] A SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TEST OF PERSONAL INITIATIVE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PERFORMANCE
    Bledow, Ronald
    Frese, Michael
    [J]. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 62 (02) : 229 - 258
  • [9] Brislin R. W., 1986, WORDING TRANSLATION, DOI DOI 10.1177/017084068800900318
  • [10] Speaking Up vs. Being Heard: The Disagreement Around and Outcomes of Employee Voice
    Burris, Ethan R.
    Detert, James R.
    Romney, Alexander C.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (01) : 22 - 38