How do parents decide on genetic testing in pediatrics? A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Doll, Elena Sophia [1 ,2 ]
Lerch, Seraina Petra [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Schmalenberger, Katja Maria [5 ]
Alex, Karla [6 ]
Kolker, Stefan [7 ]
Brennenstuhl, Heiko [8 ]
Pereira, Stacey [9 ]
Smith, Hadley [10 ,11 ]
Winkler, Eva Caroline [6 ]
Mahal, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Ditzen, Beate [1 ,2 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Inst Med Psychol, Bergheimer Str 20, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Greifswald, Dept Med Psychol, Greifswald, Germany
[4] German Ctr Child & Adolescent Hlth DZKJ, Partner Site Greifswald Rostock, Greifswald, Germany
[5] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Heidelberg, Dept Med Oncol, Sect Translat Med Eth,Natl Ctr Tumor Dis NCT,NCT H, Heidelberg, Germany
[7] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac, Ctr Child & Adolescent Med, Div Child Neurol & Metab Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Human Genet, Med Fac Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
[9] Baylor Coll Med, Ctr Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Houston, TX USA
[10] Harvard Med Sch, PRecis Med Translat Res PROMoTeR Ctr, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA USA
[11] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Boston, MA USA
[12] German Ctr Mental Hlth DZPG, Partner Site Mannheim Heidelberg Ulm, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Decision making; Diagnostic; Genetic testing; Parents; Predictive; METHODS APPRAISAL TOOL; DECISION-MAKING; ETHICAL-ISSUES; MIXED METHODS; CHILDREN; PERSPECTIVES; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gim.2025.101390
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: This systematic review aims to identify the factors that influence parents' decisions regarding pediatric diagnostic genetic testing (DT) and predictive genetic testing (PT). These factors are integrated into a conceptual decision-making model. Implications for genetic counseling, research, and ethics were derived. Methods: PubMed, PsychInfo, WebofScience, and related references were searched for original publications between 2000 and 2023. The extracted factors were categorized using existing models. Results: Of the 5843 publications, 56 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies differentiated between DT, traditional PT, and expanded PT and described factors affecting parental decisions to have the child genetically tested and to be informed about additional findings. Factors included (1) benefits/hopes, (2) worries/concerns, (3) values and beliefs, (4) individual circumstances, and (5) emotional states. Conclusion: Our work extends the existing empirical decision model of family decisions about genome sequencing to genetic testing in pediatrics in general, adding the categories of individual circumstances and emotional states. These factors can be further integrated into the Health Belief Model; the importance of emotional states is reflected in dual-process theories, such as the Fuzzy Trace Theory. Research is required on emotional states, differences between DT and PT, parents' decisions regarding result disclosure, and dyadic variables as decision-making predictors. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The views of people with a lived experience of deafness and the general public regarding genetic testing for deafness in the reproductive setting: A systematic review
    Freeman, Lucinda
    Righetti, Sarah
    Delatycki, Martin B.
    Scully, Jackie Leach
    Kirk, Edwin P.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (09) : 1803 - 1813
  • [42] How do Midwives and Physicians Discuss Childhood Vaccination with Parents?
    Dube, Eve
    Vivion, Maryline
    Sauvageau, Chantal
    Gagneur, Arnaud
    Gagnon, Raymonde
    Guay, Maryse
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2013, 2 (04): : 242 - 259
  • [43] The value of diagnostic testing for parents of children with rare genetic diseases
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    MacDonald, Karen V.
    Heidenreich, Sebastian
    Hartley, Taila
    Bernier, Francois P.
    Gillespie, Meredith K.
    McInnes, Brenda
    Innes, A. Micheil
    Armour, Christine M.
    Boycott, Kym M.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 21 (12) : 2798 - 2806
  • [44] Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a systematic review of the healthcare experiences and needs of parents
    Heaney, Suzanne
    Tomlinson, Mark
    Aventin, Aine
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [45] A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: systematic review
    Ackerson, Kelly
    Preston, Stephanie D.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (06) : 1130 - 1140
  • [46] How do health professionals decide whether an interpreter is needed for families in neonatal and pediatric units?
    Jones, Liz
    Sheeran, Nicola
    Pines, Rachyl
    Saunders, Bradley
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (09) : 1629 - 1635
  • [47] A systematic review of issues around antenatal screening and prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders: women of Asian origin in western countries
    Yu, Juping
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2012, 20 (04) : 329 - 346
  • [48] What matters to parents? A scoping review of parents' service experiences and needs regarding genetic testing for rare diseases
    Crellin, Erin
    Martyn, Melissa
    McClaren, Belinda
    Gaff, Clara
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2023, 31 (08) : 869 - 878
  • [49] Stress among Parents of Children with Hearing Loss and How They Deal with It: A Systematic Review
    Gunjawate, Dhanshree R.
    Ravi, Rohit
    Driscoll, Carlie
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 27 (01) : 166 - 177
  • [50] A private matter: how patients decide what to do with cryopreserved embryos after infertility treatment
    Provoost, Veerle
    Pennings, Guido
    De Sutter, Petra
    Dhont, Marc
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2012, 15 (04) : 210 - 216