Investigating Research Practices: How Qualitative Methods Enhance Philosophical Understandings of Science

被引:3
作者
Ankeny, Rachel A. [1 ]
Leonelli, Sabina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Humanities, Adelaide, Australia
[2] Univ Exeter, Exeter Ctr Study Life Sci Egenis, St Germans Rd, Exeter EX4 4PJ, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
qualitative research; philosophy of scientific practices; scientific reasoning; epistemology; study design; ORGANISMS; MODELS; BIOLOGY; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1037/qup0000289
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Qualitative research provides rigorous methods not only for investigating behavioral or social issues, but can also be used for exploring epistemic issues related to science and its practices. There is growing scholarly awareness that important aspects of science can be best understood through qualitative analyses and cannot be captured using more traditional textual sources such as publications or archival documents or via more quantitative or formalized methodologies such as citation analysis or bibliometrics. Reflecting on our own research on the philosophy of scientific practices, particularly on the role of model organisms in biology, we discuss some of the challenges associated with the design and conduct of qualitative research in the philosophy of science. We then explore three issues in more detail: The extent to which qualitative methods support the identification of media and spaces for the study of epistemic questions in science; the investigation of social structures particularly relevant to scientific practices and reasoning; and the conceptual and interpretative significance of analytic choices in empirical research on science. In closing, we reflect on the value of qualitative research methods for understanding scientific practices as ways to identify novel research directions, refine and augment philosophically motivated research questions, investigate the rationales and procedures through which particular scientific choices become ingrained in research, and question the implications of such habits as norms for what counts as "best practice" in particular scientific fields, all of which are topics that deserve more attention from philosophers and other scholars interested in scientific practices.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 262
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Ankeny R. A., 2024, Methods in the philosophy of science
[2]   Sequencing the genome from nematode to human: changing methods, changing science [J].
Ankeny, RA .
ENDEAVOUR, 2003, 27 (02) :87-92
[3]   Model organisms as models: Understanding the 'lingua franca' of the Human Genome Project [J].
Ankeny, RA .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2001, 68 (03) :S251-S261
[4]   The natural history of Caenorhabditis elegans research [J].
Ankeny, RA .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2001, 2 (06) :474-479
[5]   Fashioning descriptive models in biology: Of worms and wiring diagrams [J].
Ankeny, RA .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2000, 67 (03) :S260-S272
[6]  
Ankeny RA., 2020, Model Organisms, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781108593014, 10.1017/ 9781108593014]
[7]   Introduction: philosophy of science in practice [J].
Ankeny, Rachel ;
Chang, Hasok ;
Boumans, Marcel ;
Boon, Mieke .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2011, 1 (03) :303-307
[8]   Repertoires: A post-Kuhnian perspective on scientific change and collaborative research [J].
Ankeny, Rachel A. ;
Leonelli, Sabina .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2016, 60 :18-28
[9]   Making Organisms Model Human Behavior: Situated Models in North-American Alcohol Research, since 1950 [J].
Ankeny, Rachel A. ;
Leonelli, Sabina ;
Nelson, Nicole C. ;
Ramsden, Edmund .
SCIENCE IN CONTEXT, 2014, 27 (03) :485-509
[10]   What's so special about model organisms? [J].
Ankeny, Rachel A. ;
Leonelli, Sabina .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2011, 42 (02) :313-323