Development and comprehensive clinical validation of a deep neural network for radiation dose modelling to enhance magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy

被引:0
作者
Schneider, Moritz [1 ]
Gutwein, Simon [1 ]
Moennich, David [1 ]
Gani, Cihan [2 ]
Fischer, Paul [3 ,4 ]
Baumgartner, Christian F. [3 ,4 ]
Thorwarth, Daniela [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sect Biomed Phys, Hoppe Seyler Str 3, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, Cluster Excellence Machine Learning New Perspect S, Tubingen, Germany
[4] Univ Lucerne, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Luzern, Switzerland
[5] Partnership DKFZ & Univ Hosp Tubingen, German Canc Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2025年 / 33卷
关键词
Dose calculation; MRI-guided radiotherapy; Artificial intelligence; Online adaptive radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2025.100723
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Online adaptive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy requires fast dose calculation algorithms to reduce intra-fraction motion uncertainties and improve workflow efficiency. While Monte-Carlo simulations are precise but computationally intensive, neural networks promise fast and accurate dose modelling in strong magnetic fields. This study aimed to train and evaluate a deep neural network for dose modelling in MRI-guided radiotherapy using a comprehensive clinical dataset. Materials and methods: A dataset of 6595 clinical irradiation segments from 125 1.5 T MRI-Linac radiotherapy plans for various tumors sites was used. A 3D U-Net was trained with 3961 segments using 3D imaging data and field parameters as input, Root Mean Squared Error and a custom loss function, with full Monte-Carlo simulations as ground truth. For 2656 segments from 50 patients, gamma pass rates (gamma-PR) for 3 mm/3%, 2 mm/2%, and 1 mm/1% criteria were calculated to assess dose modelling accuracy. Performance was also tested in a standardized water phantom to evaluate basic radiation physics properties. Results: The neural network accurately modeled dose distributions in both patient and water phantom settings. Median (range) gamma-PR of 97.7% (87.5-100.0%), 89.1% (69.7-99.4%), and 60.8% (38.5-82.1%) were observed for treatment plans, and 97.1% (55.5-100.0%), 88.8% (38.8-99.7%), and 61.7% (17.9-94.4%) for individual segments, across the three criteria. Conclusion: High median gamma-PR and accurate modelling in both water phantom and clinical data demonstrate the high potential of neural networks for dose modelling. However, instances of lower gamma-PR highlight the need for comprehensive test data, improved robustness and future built-in uncertainty estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] GEANT4-a simulation toolkit
    Agostinelli, S
    Allison, J
    Amako, K
    Apostolakis, J
    Araujo, H
    Arce, P
    Asai, M
    Axen, D
    Banerjee, S
    Barrand, G
    Behner, F
    Bellagamba, L
    Boudreau, J
    Broglia, L
    Brunengo, A
    Burkhardt, H
    Chauvie, S
    Chuma, J
    Chytracek, R
    Cooperman, G
    Cosmo, G
    Degtyarenko, P
    Dell'Acqua, A
    Depaola, G
    Dietrich, D
    Enami, R
    Feliciello, A
    Ferguson, C
    Fesefeldt, H
    Folger, G
    Foppiano, F
    Forti, A
    Garelli, S
    Giani, S
    Giannitrapani, R
    Gibin, D
    Cadenas, JJG
    González, I
    Abril, GG
    Greeniaus, G
    Greiner, W
    Grichine, V
    Grossheim, A
    Guatelli, S
    Gumplinger, P
    Hamatsu, R
    Hashimoto, K
    Hasui, H
    Heikkinen, A
    Howard, A
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 506 (03) : 250 - 303
  • [2] Deep dose plugin: towards real-time Monte Carlo dose calculation through a deep learning-based denoising algorithm
    Bai, Ti
    Wang, Biling
    Nguyen, Dan
    Jiang, Steve
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 2 (02):
  • [3] A revision of the γ-evaluation concept for the comparison of dose distributions
    Bakai, A
    Alber, M
    Nüsslin, F
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (21) : 3543 - 3553
  • [4] Cicek Ozgun, 2016, 3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation, P424
  • [5] Dosimetric Evaluation of Dose Calculation Uncertainties for MR-Only Approaches in Prostate MR-Guided Radiotherapy
    Coric, Ivan
    Shreshtha, Kumar
    Roque, Thais
    Paragios, Nikos
    Gani, Cihan
    Zips, Daniel
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Nachbar, Marcel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2022, 10
  • [6] Development and validation of a 1.5 T MR-Linac full accelerator head and cryostat model for Monte Carlo dose simulations
    Friedel, M.
    Nachbar, M.
    Moennich, D.
    Dohm, O.
    Thorwarth, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (11) : 5304 - 5313
  • [7] Fast dose calculation in magnetic fields with GPUMCD
    Hissoiny, S.
    Raaijmakers, A. J. E.
    Ozell, B.
    Despres, P.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (16) : 5119 - 5129
  • [8] The effect of statistical uncertainty on inverse treatment planning based on Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Jeraj, R
    Keall, P
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (12) : 3601 - 3613
  • [9] Investigation of variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo photon dose calculation using XVMC
    Kawrakow, I
    Fippel, M
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (08) : 2163 - 2183
  • [10] Efficient photon beam dose calculations using DOSXYZnrc with BEAMnrc
    Kawrakow, I.
    Walters, B. R. B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (08) : 3046 - 3056