Abdominal obesity and cardiometabolic risk markers: A comparative analysis of waist circumference, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and magnetic resonance imaging techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Ruano, Giulianna Regeni [1 ]
Nogueira, Guilherme Augusto [2 ]
Dadson, Prince [3 ]
Ferreira, Sandra R. G. [4 ]
Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit [5 ]
Velloso, Licio A. [2 ]
Monfort-Pires, Milena [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] State Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Obes & Comorbid Res Ctr, Lab Cell Signaling, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Turku, Turku PET Ctr, Turku, Finland
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Sao Paulo FMUSP, Med Sch, Dept Radiol & Oncol, Div Nucl Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Abdominal obesity; Waist circumference; DXA; MRI; Cardiometabolic risk markers; ROC analysis; VISCERAL ADIPOSE-TISSUE; BODY-MASS INDEX; METABOLIC SYNDROME; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; GLUCOSE-UPTAKE; LIFETIME RISK; HIP RATIO; FAT; COMPARTMENTS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.numecd.2024.103801
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aims: This study compares three methods to determine central adiposity (waist circumference -WC - and visceral adipose tissue - VAT - estimated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry - DXA, and by magnetic resonance imaging - MRI) in their ability to predict increases in cardiometabolic risk (CMR) markers in young individuals. We examined their associations with CMR in 47 men and women aged 25-40. Methods and results: VAT mass was assessed using DXA and MRI. Blood samples were analyzed for CMR markers. Associations between central adiposity measurements and CMR factors were analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient, and the ability of these three central adiposity measurements to detect increased CMR was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Similar to what was observed for the MRI-DXA and VAT-DXA, WC showed strong correlations with LDL-c and triglycerides (TG) and an inverse correlation with HDL-c (rho = -0.657 MRI, rho = -0.628 DXA, and rho = -0.604 WC, p < 0.01). On the other hand, only MRI-VAT and WC were associated with insulin and HOMA-IR (rho = 0.341 MRI and rho = 0.421 WC, p < 0.01). Central adiposity measurements were negatively associated with cold-induced F-18-FDG uptake in subcutaneous adipose tissue and positively associated with VAT TG content. No significant differences were observed when comparing the three central adiposity measurements in ROC curve analysis, and all measurements could predict increases in CMR markers and the combined CMR index. Conclusions: This study reinforces the importance of using WC to assess increases in CMR markers among young adults. Given its practicality and efficacy, WC should be recommended in health centers to assess CMR risk.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the Classification of Obesity by BMI vs. Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in the Newfoundland Population
    Kennedy, Aaron P.
    Shea, Jennifer L.
    Sun, Guang
    OBESITY, 2009, 17 (11) : 2094 - 2099
  • [22] Common errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in imaging centers in Ecuador
    Maldonado, Genessis
    Intriago, Maria
    Larroude, Maria
    Aguilar, Gabriel
    Moreno, Mario
    Gonzalez, Jose
    Vargas, Sara
    Vera, Claudia
    Rios, Karla
    Rios, Carlos
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [23] Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scan Autoanalysis vs Manual Analysis
    Baniak, Nicholas
    Grzybowski, Stephanie
    Olszynski, Wojciech P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2014, 17 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [24] Common errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in imaging centers in Ecuador
    Genessis Maldonado
    Maria Intriago
    Maria Larroude
    Gabriel Aguilar
    Mario Moreno
    Jose Gonzalez
    Sara Vargas
    Claudia Vera
    Karla Rios
    Carlos Rios
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 2020, 15
  • [25] Abdominal aortic calcification on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: Methods of assessment and clinical significance
    Schousboe, John T.
    Lewis, Joshua R.
    Iiel, Douglas P.
    BONE, 2017, 104 : 91 - 100
  • [26] Obesity Increases Precision Errors in Total Body Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements
    Knapp, Karen M.
    Welsman, Joanne R.
    Hopkins, Susan J.
    Shallcross, Andrew
    Fogelman, Ignac
    Blake, Glen M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2015, 18 (02) : 209 - 216
  • [27] Body composition, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and obesity: the paradigm of fat (re)distribution
    Ponti, Federico
    Plazzi, Andrea
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Marchesini, Giulio
    Bazzocchi, Alberto
    BJR CASE REPORTS, 2019, 5 (03):
  • [28] Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Skinfold Thickness, and Waist Circumference for Assessing Body Composition in Ambulant and Non-Ambulant Wheelchair Games Players
    Willems, Annika
    Paulson, Thomas A. W.
    Keil, Mhairi
    Brooke-Wavell, Katherine
    Goosey-Tolfrey, Victoria L.
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [29] Comparison of Gross Body Fat-Water Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Obese Women
    Silver, Heidi J.
    Niswender, Kevin D.
    Kullberg, Joel
    Berglund, Johan
    Johansson, Lars
    Bruvold, Morten
    Avison, Malcolm J.
    Welch, E. Brian
    OBESITY, 2013, 21 (04) : 765 - 774
  • [30] Comparison of regional fat measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional anthropometry and their association with markers of diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk
    Vasan, S. K.
    Osmond, C.
    Canoy, D.
    Christodoulides, C.
    Neville, M. J.
    Di Gravio, C.
    Fall, C. H. D.
    Karpe, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2018, 42 (04) : 850 - 857