Technological Innovation, Trade Openness, Natural Resources, and Environmental Sustainability in Egypt and Turkey: Evidence from Load Capacity Factor and Inverted Load Capacity Factor with Fourier Functions

被引:3
作者
Yingjun, Zhu [1 ]
Jahan, Sharmin [1 ]
Qamruzzaman, Md. [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] United Int Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
关键词
technological innovation; trade openness; natural resources; load capacity factor; inverted load capacity factor; KUZNETS CURVE HYPOTHESIS; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; IMPACT; EFFICIENCY; FDI;
D O I
10.3390/su16198643
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The environmental degradation in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region leads to significant challenges regarding economic sustainability and the attainment of sustainable development goals (SDGs). The extensive use of fossil fuels in the region, as well as rapid urbanization and economic growth, has led to significant carbon emissions, together with unprecedented ecological footprints compromising environmental sustainability. The study aims to elucidate the influence exerted by technological innovation, trade openness, and natural resources on environmental sustainability in Turkey and Egypt for the period 1990-2022. In assessing the empirical relations, the study employed the Fourier function incorporate estimation techniques, that is, Fourier ADF for unit root test, Fourier ARDL, and Fourier NARDL for long-run and short-run elasticities of technological innovation (TI), trade openness (TO,) and natural resources rent (NRR) on load capacity factor (LCF) and inverted LCF (ILCF); finally, the directional causality evaluate through Fourier TY causality test. The results revealed that both Turkey and Egypt have severe environmental problems due to their high carbon emissions and ecological footprints. Technological change and international trade separately negatively affect environmental sustainability; however, these negative impacts have mixed character. On the one hand, technology can improve efficiency and reduce ecological footprints by obviating the use of high-impact processes or allowing cleaner production systems. In the same vein, trade openness helps transfer green technologies more quickly, but it can also lead to unsustainable resource extraction and pollution. The findings of the paper propose that in order to move forward, Turkey and Egypt need strategic policy shifts to ensure environmental sustainability, including transitioning towards renewable energy from fossil fuels while bolstering their capacity for energy efficiency. Policymakers must balance economic development with environmental conservation to reduce the harmful effects of climate degradation and help safeguard continued economic survival in the face of increasing climatic instability. This research helps to inform policy and investment decisions about how the SDGs can be achieved and how they are relevant for sustainable development in the MENA region.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in terms of ecological footprint and CO2 emissions through energy diversification for Turkey
    Acaroglu, Hakan
    Kartal, Hatice Melissa
    Marquez, Fausto Pedro Garcia
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (22) : 63289 - 63304
  • [2] Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Akcigit, Ufuk
    Alp, Harun
    Bloom, Nicholas
    Kerr, William
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 108 (11) : 3450 - 3491
  • [3] Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: linking oil consumption, hydro energy consumption, and ecological footprint in Turkey
    Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (07) : 18890 - 18900
  • [4] Financial Inclusion, Technological Innovations, and Environmental Quality: Analyzing the Role of Green Openness
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Bai, Yang
    Qiao, Guitao
    Popp, Jozsef
    Olah, Judit
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [5] The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Jiang, Ping
    Majeed, Abdul
    Umar, Muhammad
    Khan, Zeeshan
    Muhammad, Sulaman
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69 (69)
  • [6] Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Wang, Zhaohua
    Mahmood, Faisal
    Hafeez, Muhammad
    Ali, Nazakat
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (18) : 18565 - 18582
  • [7] Integrating cleaner production into sustainability strategies: an introduction to this special volume
    Almeida, C. M. V. B.
    Agostinho, F.
    Giannetti, B. F.
    Huisingh, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 96 : 1 - 9
  • [8] Time-varying causality between income inequality and ecological footprint in Turkey
    Altintas, Nurullah
    Kirca, Mustafa
    Acar, Samet
    Aydin, Abdullah
    Ozturk, Musa
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (05) : 11785 - 11797
  • [9] The dynamic relationship between economic globalisation, institutional quality, and ecological footprint: Evidence from Ghana
    Amegavi, George Babington
    Langnel, Zechariah
    Ahenkan, Albert
    Buabeng, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 31 (06) : 876 - 893
  • [10] An environment Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: Evidence from GCC countries
    Ansari, Mohd Arshad
    Ahmad, Muhammad Rais
    Siddique, Safeera
    Mansoor, Kashif
    [J]. CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2020, 11 (04) : 355 - 368