Supporting elementary preservice teachers' content knowledge for teaching about matter and its interactions

被引:1
作者
Van Orman, Dustin S. J. [1 ]
Melton, Josie [1 ]
Hanley, Daniel [1 ]
Castellano, Katherine E. [2 ]
Mikeska, Jamie N. [2 ]
Hanuscin, Deborah [1 ]
Borda, Emily [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Washington Univ, Sci Math & Technol Educ, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
[2] ETS, Princeton, NJ USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
content knowledge for teaching; educative curriculum materials; pedagogical design capacity; teacher education; PROGRESSION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/tea.21994
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Knowledge of science content and the ability to translate knowledge into effective teaching is known as teachers' content knowledge for teaching (CKT). Teachers with developed CKT are able to more effectively determine instructional and assessment activities that will deepen K-12 students' scientific literacy. However, preservice teachers (PSTs) can have limited opportunities to develop CKT, and little is known about how to support PST CKT development in elementary science teacher preparation. In our work, we developed instructional materials (i.e., "CKT Packets") intended to support teacher educators (TEs) in developing elementary PSTs' CKT for one content area-matter and its interactions. We facilitated a professional learning community for TEs to support their learning how to implement the materials in their courses. We report on results from a mixed-methods study using a quasi-experimental cohort control design with a pretest and posttest to understand differences in PSTs' CKT (N = 250) in eight TEs' science classrooms. Nesting PSTs within their TEs' courses, and controlling for PSTs' prior CKT, engagement time on the assessments, prior coursework, and TE time-invariant effects, we found preliminary evidence that PSTs achieved greater CKT when TEs implemented more CKT Packets. Salient factors that we hypothesize influenced TEs' productive uses of CKT Packets included disruptions to courses/contexts, TEs' sources of motivation for implementing Packets, TEs' entry points for the alignment of curricular materials with existing topics and pedagogical course emphases, TEs' approaches for first-time use of curricular materials, and TEs' experiences with the instructional routines of the Packets. We bound our interpretation of results within limitations (e.g., small sample size, quasi-experimental design) and suggest avenues for new research. Throughout this article, we include implications for TEs, PSTs, educative curricula developers, and researchers working to improve science teaching and learning for students.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1131
页数:29
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Committee on the Evaluation Framework for Successful K-12 STEM Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, A framework for K12 science education: Practices, cross cutting concepts, and core ideas
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Call to Action for Science Education: Building Opportunity for the Future, DOI [DOI 10.17226/26152, 10.1126/science.173.4002.1124, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.1260088]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, Science teachers learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts
  • [5] [Anonymous], NEXT GENERATION SCIE, DOI DOI 10.17226/18290
  • [6] Ball D.L., 2008, Journal of Teacher Education, V59, P389, DOI DOI 10.1177/0022487108324554
  • [7] Understanding the Big Picture for Science Teacher Education: The 2018 NSSME+
    Banilower, Eric R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 30 (03) : 201 - 208
  • [8] Developing Preservice Elementary Teachers' Pedagogical Design Capacity for Reform-Based Curriculum Design
    Beyer, Carrie J.
    Davis, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. CURRICULUM INQUIRY, 2012, 42 (03) : 386 - 413
  • [9] Bogdan RobertC., 1992, QUALITATIVE RES ED I
  • [10] Brown MW, 2009, STUD MATH THINK LEAR, P17