Monitoring terrestrial rewilding with environmental DNA metabarcoding: a systematic review of current trends and recommendations

被引:0
|
作者
Cowgill, Clare [1 ]
Gilbert, James D. J. [1 ]
Convery, Ian [2 ]
Handley, Lori Lawson [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Sch Nat Sci, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[2] Univ Cumbria, Inst Sci & Environm, Ambleside, England
[3] Lancaster Environm Ctr, UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lake Ecosyst Grp, Lancaster, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE | 2025年 / 5卷
关键词
environmental DNA; eDNA; biodiversity monitoring; terrestrial; rewilding; DNA-based monitoring; BIODIVERSITY; EDNA; REVOLUTION; WATER; TOOL;
D O I
10.3389/fcosc.2024.1473957
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rewilding, the facilitation of self-sustaining and resilient ecosystems by restoring natural processes, is an increasingly popular conservation approach and potential solution to the biodiversity and climate crises. Outcomes of rewilding can be unpredictable, and monitoring is essential to determine whether ecosystems are recovering. Metabarcoding, particularly of environmental DNA (eDNA), is revolutionizing biodiversity monitoring and could play an important role in understanding the impacts of rewilding but has mostly been applied within aquatic systems. Methods: This systematic review focuses on the applications of eDNA metabarcoding in terrestrial monitoring, with additional insights from metabarcoding of bulk and ingested DNA. We examine publication trends, choice of sampling substrate and focal taxa, and investigate how well metabarcoding performs compared to other monitoring methods (e.g. camera trapping). Results: Terrestrial ecosystems represented a small proportion of total papers, with forests the most studied system, soil and water the most popular substrates, and vertebrates the most targeted taxa. Most studies focused on measuring species richness, and few included analyzes of functional diversity. Greater species richness was found when using multiple substrates, but few studies took this approach. Metabarcoding did not consistently outperform other methods in terms of the number of vertebrate taxa detected, and this was likely influenced by choice of marker, sampling substrate and habitat. Discussion: Our findings indicate that metabarcoding, particularly of eDNA, has the potential to play a key role in the monitoring of terrestrial rewilding, but that further ground- truthing is needed to establish the most appropriate sampling and experimental pipelines for the target taxa and terrestrial system of interest.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Monitoring freshwater fish communities in large rivers using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a long-term electrofishing survey
    Goutte, Aurelie
    Molbert, Noelie
    Guerin, Sabrina
    Richoux, Robin
    Rocher, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2020, 97 (02) : 444 - 452
  • [32] Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring
    Lynggaard, Christina
    Bertelsen, Mads Frost
    Jensen, Casper, V
    Johnson, Matthew S.
    Froslev, Tobias Guldberg
    Olsen, Morten Tange
    Bohmann, Kristine
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (03) : 701 - +
  • [33] A Systematic Review of Sources of Variability and Uncertainty in eDNA Data for Environmental Monitoring
    Mathieu, Chloe
    Hermans, Syrie M.
    Lear, Gavin
    Buckley, Thomas R.
    Lee, Kevin C.
    Buckley, Hannah L.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 8 : 1 - 14
  • [34] Macrobial airborne environmental DNA analysis: A review of progress, challenges, and recommendations for an emerging application
    Johnson, Mark
    Barnes, Matthew A.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2024, 24 (07)
  • [35] Unraveling the potential of environmental DNA for deciphering recent advances in plant-animal interactions: a systematic review
    Hassan, Shahnawaz
    Ganiee, Shahid Ahmad
    Yaseen, Aarif
    Zaman, Muzafar
    Shah, Abdul Jalil
    Ganai, Bashir Ahmad
    PLANTA, 2023, 258 (06)
  • [36] Use of passive sampling in environmental DNA metabarcoding technology: Monitoring of fish diversity in the Jiangmen coastal waters
    Zhang, Li
    Zhou, Weiguo
    Jiao, Mengyu
    Xie, Tian
    Xie, Mujiao
    Li, Hanying
    Suo, Anning
    Yue, Weizhong
    Ding, Dewen
    He, Weihong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 908
  • [37] Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Simultaneous Monitoring and Ecological Assessment of Many Harmful Algae
    Jacobs-Palmer, Emily
    Gallego, Ramon
    Cribari, Kelly
    Keller, Abigail G.
    Kelly, Ryan P.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 9
  • [38] Monitoring mosquito richness in an understudied area: can environmental DNA metabarcoding be a complementary approach to adult trapping?
    Gutierrez-Lopez, Rafael
    Egeter, Bastian
    Paupy, Christophe
    Rahola, Nil
    Makanga, Boris
    Jiolle, Davy
    Bourret, Vincent
    Melo, Martim
    Loiseau, Claire
    BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 113 (04) : 456 - 468
  • [39] Coastal rocky reef fish monitoring in the context of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Environmental DNA metabarcoding complements underwater visual census
    Rey, Anais
    Viard, Frederique
    Lize, Anne
    Corre, Erwan
    Valentini, Alice
    Thiriet, Pierre
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 241
  • [40] Environmental DNA in human and veterinary parasitology-Current applications and future prospects for monitoring and control
    Sengupta, M. E.
    Lynggaard, C.
    Mukaratirwa, S.
    Vennervald, B. J.
    Stensgaard, A. S.
    FOOD AND WATERBORNE PARASITOLOGY, 2022, 29