Monitoring terrestrial rewilding with environmental DNA metabarcoding: a systematic review of current trends and recommendations

被引:0
|
作者
Cowgill, Clare [1 ]
Gilbert, James D. J. [1 ]
Convery, Ian [2 ]
Handley, Lori Lawson [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Sch Nat Sci, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[2] Univ Cumbria, Inst Sci & Environm, Ambleside, England
[3] Lancaster Environm Ctr, UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lake Ecosyst Grp, Lancaster, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE | 2025年 / 5卷
关键词
environmental DNA; eDNA; biodiversity monitoring; terrestrial; rewilding; DNA-based monitoring; BIODIVERSITY; EDNA; REVOLUTION; WATER; TOOL;
D O I
10.3389/fcosc.2024.1473957
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rewilding, the facilitation of self-sustaining and resilient ecosystems by restoring natural processes, is an increasingly popular conservation approach and potential solution to the biodiversity and climate crises. Outcomes of rewilding can be unpredictable, and monitoring is essential to determine whether ecosystems are recovering. Metabarcoding, particularly of environmental DNA (eDNA), is revolutionizing biodiversity monitoring and could play an important role in understanding the impacts of rewilding but has mostly been applied within aquatic systems. Methods: This systematic review focuses on the applications of eDNA metabarcoding in terrestrial monitoring, with additional insights from metabarcoding of bulk and ingested DNA. We examine publication trends, choice of sampling substrate and focal taxa, and investigate how well metabarcoding performs compared to other monitoring methods (e.g. camera trapping). Results: Terrestrial ecosystems represented a small proportion of total papers, with forests the most studied system, soil and water the most popular substrates, and vertebrates the most targeted taxa. Most studies focused on measuring species richness, and few included analyzes of functional diversity. Greater species richness was found when using multiple substrates, but few studies took this approach. Metabarcoding did not consistently outperform other methods in terms of the number of vertebrate taxa detected, and this was likely influenced by choice of marker, sampling substrate and habitat. Discussion: Our findings indicate that metabarcoding, particularly of eDNA, has the potential to play a key role in the monitoring of terrestrial rewilding, but that further ground- truthing is needed to establish the most appropriate sampling and experimental pipelines for the target taxa and terrestrial system of interest.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Methodology for fish biodiversity monitoring with environmental DNA metabarcoding: The primers, databases and bioinformatic pipelines
    Xiong, Fan
    Shu, Lu
    Zeng, Honghui
    Gan, Xiaoni
    He, Shunping
    Peng, Zuogang
    WATER BIOLOGY AND SECURITY, 2022, 1 (01):
  • [22] Evaluation of Fish Biodiversity in Estuaries Through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Comprehensive Review
    Alenzi, Asma Massad
    FISHES, 2024, 9 (11)
  • [23] Holistic monitoring of freshwater and terrestrial vertebrates by camera trapping and environmental DNA
    Holm, Anne Marie Rubaek
    Knudsen, Steen Wilhelm
    Mansson, Malene
    Pedersen, Ditte Elmgreen
    Nordfoss, Pauli Holm
    Johansson, Daniel Klingberg
    Gramsbergen, Marthe
    Havmoller, Rasmus Worsoe
    Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng
    Thomsen, Philip Francis
    Olsen, Morten Tange
    Moller, Peter Rask
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2023, 5 (06): : 1608 - 1622
  • [24] Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and High-Resolution Underwater Optical Imaging for Noninvasive and Innovative Marine Environmental Monitoring
    Yang, Jing
    Li, Chao
    Lo, Linus Shing Him
    Zhang, Xu
    Chen, Zhikui
    Gao, Jing
    Clara, U.
    Dai, Zhijun
    Nakaoka, Masahiro
    Yang, Huayong
    Cheng, Jinping
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [25] Environmental DNA metabarcoding as an effective and rapid tool for fish monitoring in canals
    McDevitt, Allan D.
    Sales, Naiara Guimaraes
    Browett, Samuel S.
    Sparnenn, Abbie O.
    Mariani, Stefano
    Wangensteen, Owen S.
    Coscia, Ilaria
    Benvenuto, Chiara
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2019, 95 (02) : 679 - 682
  • [26] Environmental DNA Metabarcoding as a Promising Conservation Tool for Monitoring Fish Diversity in Dongshan Bay, China
    Zhang, Yanxu
    He, Weiyi
    Wang, Lei
    Ou, Danyun
    Qiu, Jinli
    Li, Weiwen
    Huang, Hao
    WATER, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [27] Coral monitoring in northwest Australia with environmental DNA metabarcoding using a curated reference database for optimized detection
    Dugal, Laurence
    Thomas, Luke
    Wilkinson, Shaun P.
    Richards, Zoe T.
    Alexander, Jason B.
    Adam, Arne A. S.
    Kennington, W. Jason
    Jarman, Simon
    Ryan, Nicole M.
    Bunce, Michael
    Gilmour, James P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2022, 4 (01): : 63 - 76
  • [28] Monitoring the threatened Harttiella (Siluriformes, Loricariidae) with environmental DNA: A comparison between metabarcoding and targeted digital PCR
    Condachou, Celine
    Cuenot, Yves
    Pigeyre, Laetitia
    Covain, Raphael
    Brosse, Sebastien
    Murienne, Jerome
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2024, 34 (02)
  • [29] Assessing the potential of environmental DNA metabarcoding for monitoring Neotropical mammals: a case study in the Amazon and Atlantic Forest, Brazil
    Sales, Naiara Guimaraes
    Kaizer, Mariane da Cruz
    Coscia, Ilaria
    Perkins, Joseph C.
    Highlands, Andrew
    Boubli, Jean P.
    Magnusson, William E.
    Ferreira Silva, Maria Nazareth
    Benvenuto, Chiara
    Mcdevitt, Allan D.
    MAMMAL REVIEW, 2020, 50 (03) : 221 - 225
  • [30] Environmental DNA metabarcoding for monitoring metazoan biodiversity in Antarctic nearshore ecosystems
    Clarke, Laurence J.
    Suter, Leonie
    Deagle, Bruce E.
    Polanowski, Andrea M.
    Terauds, Aleks
    Johnstone, Glenn J.
    Stark, Jonathan S.
    PEERJ, 2021, 9