Monitoring terrestrial rewilding with environmental DNA metabarcoding: a systematic review of current trends and recommendations

被引:0
|
作者
Cowgill, Clare [1 ]
Gilbert, James D. J. [1 ]
Convery, Ian [2 ]
Handley, Lori Lawson [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Sch Nat Sci, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[2] Univ Cumbria, Inst Sci & Environm, Ambleside, England
[3] Lancaster Environm Ctr, UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lake Ecosyst Grp, Lancaster, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE | 2025年 / 5卷
关键词
environmental DNA; eDNA; biodiversity monitoring; terrestrial; rewilding; DNA-based monitoring; BIODIVERSITY; EDNA; REVOLUTION; WATER; TOOL;
D O I
10.3389/fcosc.2024.1473957
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rewilding, the facilitation of self-sustaining and resilient ecosystems by restoring natural processes, is an increasingly popular conservation approach and potential solution to the biodiversity and climate crises. Outcomes of rewilding can be unpredictable, and monitoring is essential to determine whether ecosystems are recovering. Metabarcoding, particularly of environmental DNA (eDNA), is revolutionizing biodiversity monitoring and could play an important role in understanding the impacts of rewilding but has mostly been applied within aquatic systems. Methods: This systematic review focuses on the applications of eDNA metabarcoding in terrestrial monitoring, with additional insights from metabarcoding of bulk and ingested DNA. We examine publication trends, choice of sampling substrate and focal taxa, and investigate how well metabarcoding performs compared to other monitoring methods (e.g. camera trapping). Results: Terrestrial ecosystems represented a small proportion of total papers, with forests the most studied system, soil and water the most popular substrates, and vertebrates the most targeted taxa. Most studies focused on measuring species richness, and few included analyzes of functional diversity. Greater species richness was found when using multiple substrates, but few studies took this approach. Metabarcoding did not consistently outperform other methods in terms of the number of vertebrate taxa detected, and this was likely influenced by choice of marker, sampling substrate and habitat. Discussion: Our findings indicate that metabarcoding, particularly of eDNA, has the potential to play a key role in the monitoring of terrestrial rewilding, but that further ground- truthing is needed to establish the most appropriate sampling and experimental pipelines for the target taxa and terrestrial system of interest.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Contrivance for Documenting Terrestrial Biodiversity
    Hassan, Shahnawaz
    Sabreena
    Poczai, Peter
    Ganai, Bashir Ah
    Almalki, Waleed Hassan
    Gafur, Abdul
    Sayyed, R. Z.
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2022, 11 (09):
  • [2] Key factors to consider in the use of environmental DNA metabarcoding to monitor terrestrial ecological restoration
    van der Heyde, Mieke
    Bunce, Michael
    Nevill, Paul
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 848
  • [3] Testing multiple substrates for terrestrial biodiversity monitoring using environmental DNA metabarcoding
    van der Heyde, Mieke
    Bunce, Michael
    Wardell-Johnson, Grant
    Fernandes, Kristen
    White, Nicole E.
    Nevill, Paul
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2020, 20 (03) : 732 - 745
  • [4] Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Current applications and future prospects for freshwater fish monitoring
    Liu, Shuaishuai
    Chen, Juan
    Cui, Ge
    Zhang, Bo
    Yan, Bingcheng
    Nie, Qihao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 376
  • [5] Environmental DNA metabarcoding of wild flowers reveals diverse communities of terrestrial arthropods
    Thomsen, Philip Francis
    Sigsgaard, Eva E.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (04): : 1665 - 1679
  • [6] Environmental DNA metabarcoding: an approach for biodiversity monitoring
    Padilla-Garcia, Cinthia Yedith
    Camacho-Sanchez, Fatima Yedith
    Reyes-Lopez, Miguel Angel
    CIENCIAUAT, 2021, 16 (01) : 136 - 149
  • [7] Environmental DNA metabarcoding effectively monitors terrestrial species by using urban green spaces
    Kim, Whee-Moon
    Lee, Hyun-Jung
    Song, Wonkyong
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2022, 78
  • [8] Systematic review of marine environmental DNA metabarcoding studies: toward best practices for data usability and accessibility
    Shea, Meghan M.
    Kuppermann, Jacob
    Rogers, Megan P.
    Smith, Dustin Summer
    Edwards, Paul
    Boehm, Alexandria B.
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [9] Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities
    Miya, Masaki
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 14 : 161 - 185
  • [10] Monitoring terrestrial wildlife by combining hybridization capture and metabarcoding data from waterhole environmental DNA
    Li, Juan
    Seeber, Peter
    Axtner, Jan
    Crouthers, Rachel
    Groenenberg, Milou
    Koehncke, Arnulf
    Courtiol, Alexandre
    Chanratana, Pin
    Greenwood, Alex D.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2023, 284