Multilevel governance and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review

被引:0
作者
Carroll, Brendan J. [1 ]
Brummel, Lars [1 ]
Toshkov, Dimiter [1 ]
Yesilkagit, Kutsal [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, The Hague, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Multilevel governance; COVID-19; systematic literature review; federalism; decentralization; comparative public policy; COORDINATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
As the Covid-19 pandemic demanded coordinated action from governments at all levels, the role of federalism, decentralization, supranational authorities and other multilevel governance (MLG) institutions and processes in responses to it has come under much scholarly scrutiny. Three years on, much of this literature remains fragmented and in need of synthesis. In this systematic literature review we summarize the literature on the effects of MLG on governments' policy responses to Covid-19. We identified 114 contributions and synthesized their findings. While the literature reveals much about national, subnational and local responses, it remains limited by a narrow set of research methods, limited comparisons, and a lack of specificity regarding the government response studied. We conclude by proposing a research agenda that adopts comparative designs spanning both federal and non-federal countries, that clearly demarcates the scope of the government response studied, and that explores government responses in later stages of the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 326
页数:22
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19
    Adolph, Christopher
    Amano, Kenya
    Bang-Jensen, Bree
    Fullman, Nancy
    Wilkerson, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2021, 46 (02) : 211 - 233
  • [2] Between lockdown and calm down. Comparing the COVID-19 responses of Norway and Sweden
    Askim, Jostein
    Bergstrom, Tomas
    [J]. LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2022, 48 (02) : 291 - 311
  • [3] Azeroual Otmane., 2021, Libraries, Digital Information, and COVID, P169, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88493-8.00027-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-323-88493-8.00027-6]
  • [4] Regional Intergovernmental Organization Response to COVID-19: The Impact of Neoliberalism on Bureaucratic Autonomy
    Baranes, Avraham Izhar
    Hazen, Timothy
    [J]. REVIEW OF RADICAL POLITICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (04) : 420 - 428
  • [5] Boin A, 2008, GOVERNING AFTER CRISIS: THE POLITICS OF INVESTIGATION, ACCOUNTABILITY AND LEARNING, P3, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511756122.001
  • [6] Boin Arjen., 2001, MANAGING CRISES THRE, P28
  • [7] Intergovernmental dynamics in responding to COVID-19 in English and Australian cities
    Broadhurst, Kate
    Steane, Edward
    Mykhnenko, Vlad
    Gray, Nicholas
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2023, 16 (01) : 185 - 196
  • [8] Assessing the Multi-level Government Response to the COVID-19 Crisis: Italy and Spain Compared
    Casula, Mattia
    Pazos-Vidal, Serafin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 44 (11-12) : 994 - 1005
  • [9] Chattopadhyay Rupak., 2021, Federalism and the Response to COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis
  • [10] Variations in Governmental Responses to and the Diffusion of COVID-19: The Role of Political Decentralization
    Cheng, Chen
    Li, Jiasheng
    Zhang, Chuanchuan
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF ECONOMICS IN CHINA, 2021, 16 (04) : 589 - 606