"The Poor Are Hit the Hardest"-Norwegians' Perceptions of Climate (In)Justice

被引:0
作者
Gregersen, Thea [1 ,2 ]
Helliesen, Mari S. [1 ,2 ]
Jagers, Sverker C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Res Ctr NORCE, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Ctr Climate & Energy Transformat CET, Bergen, Norway
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Polit Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
climate justice; climate policy; distribution; open-ended; procedural; recognition; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; ENERGY JUSTICE; METAANALYSES; DETERMINANTS; SKEPTICISM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9477.70002
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The concept of climate justice is frequently discussed in academic literature focusing on the societal impacts of climate change and climate policy. Less attention has been paid to the public's understanding of the concept. In this paper, we investigate whether the public acknowledges a link between climate change and (in)justice, and, if so, what they consider unjust. A representative sample of the Norwegian public (N = 1923) was asked what, if anything, they think can be unjust about climate change, in an open-ended survey question. Categorizing the responses in line with conventional climate justice dimensions, we found that the majority of respondents referred to some type of distributional justice, while few referred to procedural or recognition justice arguments. Analysing the responses in a bottom-up manner, by identifying recurring themes, revealed a frequent emphasis on international distribution, followed by distribution between rich and poor and unjust climate policies. We also identified arguments diffusing Norway's responsibility, typically focusing on Norway being a small country. Our findings give insights into the type of justice arguments likely to be recognized and accepted by the Norwegian public, and how this may vary between social groups.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 73 条
[51]   Why are carbon taxes unfair? Disentangling public perceptions of fairness [J].
Povitkina, Marina ;
Jagers, Sverker Carlsson ;
Matti, Simon ;
Martinsson, Johan .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2021, 70
[52]  
Prtner H.O., 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation
[53]   Principles of environmental justice and pro-environmental action: A two-step process model of moral anger and responsibility to act [J].
Reese, Gerhard ;
Jacob, Lisa .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 51 :88-94
[54]  
Roser D., 2016, Climate Justice: An Introduction
[55]   Advancing procedural justice in conservation [J].
Ruano-Chamorro, Cristina ;
Gurney, Georgina G. ;
Cinner, Joshua E. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2022, 15 (03)
[56]   Citizens' perceptions of justice in international climate policy: an empirical analysis [J].
Schleich, Joachim ;
Duetschke, Elisabeth ;
Schwirplies, Claudia ;
Ziegler, Andreas .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2016, 16 (01) :50-67
[57]   From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice [J].
Schlosberg, David ;
Collins, Lisette B. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 5 (03) :359-374
[58]   Coordinating social equity and emissions: Challenges in carbon tax policy [J].
Semet, Raphael .
ENERGY POLICY, 2024, 185
[59]   Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions [J].
Sovacool, Benjamin K. ;
Martiskainen, Mari ;
Hook, Andrew ;
Baker, Lucy .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2019, 155 (04) :581-619
[60]   The Psychological Distance of Climate Change [J].
Spence, Alexa ;
Poortinga, Wouter ;
Pidgeon, Nick .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2012, 32 (06) :957-972