"The Poor Are Hit the Hardest"-Norwegians' Perceptions of Climate (In)Justice

被引:0
作者
Gregersen, Thea [1 ,2 ]
Helliesen, Mari S. [1 ,2 ]
Jagers, Sverker C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Res Ctr NORCE, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Ctr Climate & Energy Transformat CET, Bergen, Norway
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Polit Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
climate justice; climate policy; distribution; open-ended; procedural; recognition; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; ENERGY JUSTICE; METAANALYSES; DETERMINANTS; SKEPTICISM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9477.70002
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The concept of climate justice is frequently discussed in academic literature focusing on the societal impacts of climate change and climate policy. Less attention has been paid to the public's understanding of the concept. In this paper, we investigate whether the public acknowledges a link between climate change and (in)justice, and, if so, what they consider unjust. A representative sample of the Norwegian public (N = 1923) was asked what, if anything, they think can be unjust about climate change, in an open-ended survey question. Categorizing the responses in line with conventional climate justice dimensions, we found that the majority of respondents referred to some type of distributional justice, while few referred to procedural or recognition justice arguments. Analysing the responses in a bottom-up manner, by identifying recurring themes, revealed a frequent emphasis on international distribution, followed by distribution between rich and poor and unjust climate policies. We also identified arguments diffusing Norway's responsibility, typically focusing on Norway being a small country. Our findings give insights into the type of justice arguments likely to be recognized and accepted by the Norwegian public, and how this may vary between social groups.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] The 2021 Norwegian election
    Aardal, Bernt
    Bergh, Johannes
    [J]. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2022, 45 (07) : 1522 - 1534
  • [2] Just Transition: A whole-systems approach to decarbonisation
    Abram, Simone
    Atkins, Ed
    Dietzel, Alix
    Jenkins, Kirsten
    Kiamba, Lorna
    Kirshner, Joshua
    Kreienkamp, Julia
    Parkhill, Karen
    Pegram, Tom
    Santos Ayllon, Lara M.
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2022, 22 (08) : 1033 - 1049
  • [3] A fairway to fairness: Toward a richer conceptualization of fairness perceptions for just energy transitions
    Bal, Michelle
    Stok, Marijn
    Bombaerts, Gunter
    Huijts, Nicole
    Schneider, Philipp
    Spahn, Andreas
    Buskens, Vincent
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2023, 103
  • [4] Bandura A., 2011, The encyclopedia of peace psychology
  • [5] Baumert A., 2016, Handbook of social justice theory and research, P161, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0
  • [6] Meta-analyses of fifteen determinants of public opinion about climate change taxes and laws
    Bergquist, Magnus
    Nilsson, Andreas
    Harring, Niklas
    Jagers, Sverker C.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 12 (03) : 235 - +
  • [7] Bos W., 1999, INT J EDUC RES, V31, P659, DOI [10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00032-4, DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00032-4]
  • [8] Carman J., 2023, Climate Change in the American Mind: Climate Justice, Spring 2023
  • [9] Creative and disruptive elements in Norway′s climate policy mix: the small-state perspective
    Cetkovic, Stefan
    Skjaerseth, Jon Birger
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2019, 28 (06) : 1039 - 1060
  • [10] Global carbon inequality over 1990-2019
    Chancel, Lucas
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 5 (11) : 931 - +