The effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy intervention for depression in adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
作者
Kaiser, Vanessa [1 ]
Diaz, Gabriela Bertoletti [2 ]
Schaab, Bruno Luis [1 ]
Calvetti, Prisla Ucker [3 ]
Reppold, Caroline Tozzi [4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Hlth Sci Porto Alegre, Psychol Assessment Res Lab, Postgrad Program Hlth Sci, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Hlth Sci Porto Alegre, Psychol Assessment Res Lab, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[3] Pontif Catholic Univ Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[4] Fed Univ Hlth Sci Porto Alegre, Psychol Assessment Res Lab, Porto Alegre, Brazil
关键词
Depression; Mindfulness; Cognitive therapy; Systematic review; Positive psychology; BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MAJOR DEPRESSION; PSYCHO-EDUCATION; METAANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; EFFICACY; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-025-07536-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a promising intervention for relapse prevention in major depressive disorder (MDD), although its efficacy in alleviating depressive symptoms during depressive episodes remains unclear. This systematic literature review aimed to assess the efficacy of MBCT in adults diagnosed with MDD and evaluate the risk of bias in the studies. The search was conducted using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed in the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, BVS/Lilacs, IBECS, and Index Psicologia databases. A total of 5,316 articles were identified, and 16 met the inclusion criteria. Comparison conditions included active controls (other interventions) or non-active controls (waitlist or treatment as usual). MBCT was found to be superior in 10 of the studies (65%), while it showed lower efficacy in only two studies, where it was compared with the cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy. MBCT appears to be effective for adults with depressive symptoms during depressive episodes. However, only a limited number of studies have assessed the long-term effects of this intervention through follow-up assessments. The risk of bias in the studies suggests that the results should be interpreted with caution.
引用
收藏
页码:6517 / 6530
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2022, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5-TR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, World Mental Health Report: Transforming Mental Health for All
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of depression across three age cohorts
[4]   When to stop medication in unipolar depression: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Arikan, Mehmet Kemal ;
Ilhan, Reyhan ;
Pogarell, Oliver ;
Metin, Baris .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2023, 325 :7-13
[5]   Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as a treatment for chronic depression: A preliminary study [J].
Barnhofer, Thorsten ;
Crane, Catherine ;
Hargus, Emily ;
Amarasinghe, Myanthi ;
Winder, Rosie ;
Williams, J. Mark G. .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2009, 47 (05) :366-373
[6]  
Beck A. T., 1979, Guilford clinical psychology and psychotherapy series
[7]   Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy vs. psycho-education for patients with major depression who did not achieve remission following antidepressant treatment [J].
Chiesa, Alberto ;
Castagner, Vittoria ;
Andrisano, Costanza ;
Serretti, Alessandro ;
Mandelli, Laura ;
Porcelli, Stefano ;
Giommi, Fabio .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2015, 226 (2-3) :474-483
[8]   Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Versus Psycho-Education for Patients with Major Depression Who Did Not Achieve Remission Following Antidepressant Treatment: A Preliminary Analysis [J].
Chiesa, Alberto ;
Mandelli, Laura ;
Serretti, Alessandro .
JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2012, 18 (08) :756-760
[9]   Mindfulness-Based Approaches: Are They All the Same? [J].
Chiesa, Alberto ;
Malinowski, Peter .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 67 (04) :404-424
[10]  
Cochrane Collaboration, 2020, RoB 2: A revised cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials