Public collaboration to improve the future for science in Brazil

被引:0
|
作者
Forti, Lucas Rodriguez [1 ]
Szabo, Judit K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rural Semi Arido, Dept Biociencias, Av Francisco Mota,572 Bairro Costa & Silva, BR-59625900 Mossoro, RN, Brazil
[2] Charles Darwin Univ, Coll Engn IT & Environm, Casuarina, NT 0909, Australia
关键词
Brazil; Citizen science; Political polarization; Public engagement; Trust in science; CITIZEN-SCIENCE; TRUST; PARTICIPATION; INDICATORS; ENGAGEMENT; ATTITUDES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103921
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Brazil is facing a concerning scientific crisis as a result of persistent anti-science campaigns, decreasing support for public universities and pro-environmental policies, exacerbated by investment cuts to scientific agencies. While recent pro-science policies could mitigate some of this damage, the inherited public distrust in science will potentially threaten scientific progress for years to come. Since trust in science is influenced by political ideologies, combating this distrust presents a formidable challenge, demanding a strategy for public engagement and attenuation of the effects of political polarisation on science and technology. Scientific citizenship is essential to improve the way society perceives science and implements science-based policies. Funding a federal citizen science bureau to support participatory initiatives of knowledge production could bring various benefits, including increased public acceptance of science and environment protection, compliance with international agreements and UN goals, as well as higher scientific literacy among the public. It could also recover the failing trust in science, expand support for current and future citizen science initiatives, and improve minorities' access to scientific collaboration. In summary, it would provide a way to recover the role of science and thereby support public policies in Brazil with global benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Citizen science to improve patient and public involvement in GUideline Implementation in oral health and DEntistry (the GUIDE platform)
    Hosie, Annabel
    Firdaus, Maria
    Clarkson, Jan
    Gupta, Ekta
    Laidlaw, Lynn
    Lamont, Thomas
    Mooney, Margaret
    Nevin, Gillian
    Ramsay, Craig
    Rutherford, Samantha
    Sardo, Ana Margarida
    Soulsby, Irene
    Richards, Derek
    Stirling, Douglas
    West, Michele
    Goulao, Beatriz
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [32] A FUTURE FOR ORGANIZATIONAL DIVERSITY TRAINING: MOBILIZING DIVERSITY SCIENCE TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS
    Onyeador, Ivuoma N.
    Mobasseri, Sanaz
    Mckinney, Hannah L.
    Martin, Ashley E.
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2024, 38 (03) : 392 - 414
  • [33] Paths of Citizen Science in Health: processes for public engagement
    Gama, Ivanilma de Oliveira
    dos Santos, Vinicius Ribeiro Soares
    EM QUESTAO, 2024, 30
  • [34] Public Perception of Citizen Science in Spain: Sociodemographic Analysis
    Sanchez, Flor
    Casani, Fernando
    Olmos, Ricardo
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA, 2024, 47 (03):
  • [35] Science Centers and Public Participation: Methods, Strategies, and Barriers
    Bandelli, Andrea
    Konijn, Elly A.
    SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2013, 35 (04) : 419 - 448
  • [36] Dynamic development of public attitudes towards science policymaking
    Okamura, Keisuke
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2016, 25 (04) : 465 - 479
  • [37] Intelligent Sensing for Citizen Science Challenges and Future Directions
    O'Grady, Michael J.
    Muldoon, Conor
    Carr, Dominic
    Wan, Jie
    Kroon, Barnard
    O'Hare, Gregory M. P.
    MOBILE NETWORKS & APPLICATIONS, 2016, 21 (02): : 375 - 385
  • [38] Mapping the State of the Art to Envision the Future of Large-Scale Citizen Science Projects: An Interpretive Review
    Palumbo, Rocco
    Manesh, Mohammad Fakhar
    Sorrentino, Maddalena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 19 (04)
  • [39] The Challenges of Consulting the Public on Science Policy: Examining the Development of European Risk Assessment Policy for Genetically Modified Animals
    Hartley, Sarah
    Millar, Kate M.
    REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2014, 31 (06) : 481 - 502
  • [40] Communicative Aspects of the Public-Science Relationship Explored: Results of Focus Group Discussions About Biotechnology and Genomics
    Dijkstra, Anne M.
    Gutteling, Jan M.
    SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2012, 34 (03) : 363 - 391