Quantifying Uncertainty in State Estimation: The MoK-FoBS Method via Interval Analysis

被引:0
作者
Chen, Yuting [1 ]
Zhou, Ning [1 ]
Zhang, Ziang [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Uncertainty; Noise; Noise measurement; Vectors; State estimation; Power systems; Probability density function; Power measurement; Bayes methods; Power system reliability; Forward-backward propagation method; interval analysis; Krawczyk method; static state estimation; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3524563
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Bayesian framework is conventionally adopted in power system static state estimation (SSE) to quantify uncertainty via probability density functions (PDFs). However, the reliability of such PDFs is frequently undermined by the complex nature of noise in measurement systems, potentially leading to significant estimation inaccuracies. To address this problem, this paper proposes a modified Krawczyk-forward-backward synthesis (MoK-FoBS) method to quantify uncertainty in SSE through interval analysis. The proposed MoK-FoBS method combines the strengths of the modified forward-backward propagation (FBP) method with the modified Krawczyk method to mitigate the overestimation problem. Employing simulation data derived from IEEE testing systems, it is verified through the Monte Carlo method that the MoK-FoBS method can estimate hard boundaries that invariably contain the true state values. In contrast, the true state values may lie outside the uncertainty boundaries estimated by the weighted least squares approach. A comparative analysis reveals that the MoK-FoBS method can achieve narrower state boundaries than the FBP method, thereby improving estimation precision.
引用
收藏
页码:10805 / 10819
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abur A, 2004, POWER SYSTEM STATE E
[2]   Distribution system state estimation-A step towards smart grid [J].
Ahmad, Fiaz ;
Rasool, Akhtar ;
Ozsoy, Emre ;
Rajasekar, S. ;
Sabanovic, Asif ;
Elitas, Meltem .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 :2659-2671
[3]  
Anderson A. A., 2022, Tech. Rep.
[4]   EXPERIENCE WITH WEATHER SENSITIVE LOAD MODELS FOR SHORT AND LONG-TERM FORECASTING [J].
CORPENING, SL ;
REPPEN, ND ;
RINGLEE, RJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1973, PA92 (06) :1966-1972
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Developments in Reliable Computing, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-1247-7, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-1247-77]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, IFAC Proc.
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Applied Interval Analysis
[8]   PRACTICAL METHOD FOR THE DIRECT ANALYSIS OF TRANSIENT STABILITY [J].
ATHAY, T ;
PODMORE, R ;
VIRMANI, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1979, 98 (02) :573-584
[9]   RECURSIVE STATE ESTIMATION FOR A SET-MEMBERSHIP DESCRIPTION OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
BERTSEKAS, DP ;
RHODES, IB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1971, AC16 (02) :117-+
[10]   A ROBUST WLAV STATE ESTIMATOR USING TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
CELIK, MK ;
ABUR, A ;
MELIOPOULOS, APS ;
ZHANG, F ;
PHANIRAJ, V ;
CHENIAE, MG ;
MILI, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1992, 7 (01) :106-113