Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for predicting wound healing potential in burns: A critical examination

被引:0
|
作者
De Mey, Kimberly [1 ]
De Decker, Ignace [1 ,2 ]
Gush, Rodney [3 ]
Hoeksema, Henk [1 ,2 ]
Verbelen, Jozef [1 ]
De Coninck, Petra [1 ]
Blondeel, Phillip [1 ,2 ]
Monstrey, Stan [1 ,2 ]
Claes, Karel E. Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Burn Ctr, C Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, C Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Moor Instruments Ltd, Millwey Rise Ind Estate,Weycroft Ave, Axminster EX13 5HU, England
关键词
Objective assessment; Laser speckle contrast imaging; Laser Doppler imaging; Burns; Burn wounds; Healing potential; Validity; Accuracy; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; DEPTH ASSESSMENT; DOPPLER; TIME; PERFUSION; LDI;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2025.107449
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate assessment of burn depth is imperative for the efficacious management of burns. Although clinical assessment is commonly used, its accuracy ranges only between 50 % and 70 %. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is considered as a gold standard - with an accuracy exceeding 95 %, - for the objective measurement of Healing Potential (HP), HP being the output of the LDI device, as colour-coded on LDI blood flow images. Despite its proven efficacy, widespread adoption is impeded by practical challenges. Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) emerges as a possible alternative. This study investigated the performance and accuracy of LSCI in comparison with LDI for predicting the HP of burns; LDI was assumed to provide 'ground truth' for the assessment of HP. Methods: Hospitalized burn patients underwent LDI and LSCI scans between day 2 and day 5 postburn. Analysis involved selecting corresponding regions of interest (ROI) in target wounds prioritized by LDI and LSCI perspectives. Results: In 19 patients, 112 ROI within LDI-priority ranges were collected from 50 target wounds. 130 ROI within LSCI-priority ranges were collected from 52 target wounds. Positive predictive values (PPV) were low, at only 50.8 % and 68.2 % for HP14-21 and HP21, respectively, and 86.9 % for HP14. Conclusion: Objective assessment by LSCI for burns is not recommended, as it fails to detect deep dermal blood flow, leading to an overestimation of burn severity and potential inadequacies in therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of laser Doppler and laser speckle contrast imaging using a concurrent processing system
    Sun, Shen
    Hayes-Gill, Barrie R.
    He, Diwei
    Zhu, Yiqun
    Huynh, Nam T.
    Morgan, Stephen P.
    OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 83 : 1 - 9
  • [32] Nephron blood flow dynamics measured by laser speckle contrast imaging
    Holstein-Rathlou, Niels-Henrik
    Sosnovtseva, Olga V.
    Pavlov, Alexey N.
    Cupples, William A.
    Sorensen, Charlotte Mehlin
    Marsh, Donald J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 300 (02) : F319 - F329
  • [33] Laser speckle contrast imaging for measuring blood flow
    Briers, J. David
    OPTICA APPLICATA, 2007, 37 (1-2) : 139 - 152
  • [34] Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging of flow in a microfluidic device
    Parthasarathy, Ashwin B.
    Shin, Weon Gyu
    Zhang, X. J.
    Dunn, A. K.
    BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF LIGHT SCATTERING, 2007, 6446
  • [35] Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review
    Konovalov, Anton
    Gadzhiagaev, Vadim
    Grebenev, Fyodor
    Stavtsev, Dmitry
    Piavchenko, Gennadii
    Gerasimenko, Alexander
    Telyshev, Dmitry
    Meglinski, Igor
    Eliava, Shalva
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 35 - 40
  • [36] Depth of Field Extension in Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging
    Ma, Xiaohui
    Wang, Anting
    Ma, Fenghua
    Wu, Shuimei
    Ming, Hai
    Zhan, Qiwen
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 31499 - 31506
  • [37] Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging for the Quantitative Assessment of Flow
    Duncan, Donald D.
    Kirkpatrick, Sean J.
    Gladish, James C.
    Hurst, Sawan A.
    DYNAMICS AND FLUCTUATIONS IN BIOMEDICAL PHOTONICS VI, 2009, 7176
  • [38] Laser speckle contrast imaging is sensitive to advective flux
    Khaksari, Kosar
    Kirkpatrick, Sean J.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2016, 21 (07)
  • [39] Multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging of the angiogenic microenvironment
    Rege, Abhishek
    Murari, Kartikeya
    Seifert, Alan
    Pathak, Arvind P.
    Thakor, Nitish V.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2011, 16 (05)
  • [40] Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging of Cerebral Blood Flow
    Dunn, Andrew K.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 40 (02) : 367 - 377