Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for predicting wound healing potential in burns: A critical examination

被引:0
|
作者
De Mey, Kimberly [1 ]
De Decker, Ignace [1 ,2 ]
Gush, Rodney [3 ]
Hoeksema, Henk [1 ,2 ]
Verbelen, Jozef [1 ]
De Coninck, Petra [1 ]
Blondeel, Phillip [1 ,2 ]
Monstrey, Stan [1 ,2 ]
Claes, Karel E. Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Burn Ctr, C Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, C Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Moor Instruments Ltd, Millwey Rise Ind Estate,Weycroft Ave, Axminster EX13 5HU, England
关键词
Objective assessment; Laser speckle contrast imaging; Laser Doppler imaging; Burns; Burn wounds; Healing potential; Validity; Accuracy; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; DEPTH ASSESSMENT; DOPPLER; TIME; PERFUSION; LDI;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2025.107449
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate assessment of burn depth is imperative for the efficacious management of burns. Although clinical assessment is commonly used, its accuracy ranges only between 50 % and 70 %. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is considered as a gold standard - with an accuracy exceeding 95 %, - for the objective measurement of Healing Potential (HP), HP being the output of the LDI device, as colour-coded on LDI blood flow images. Despite its proven efficacy, widespread adoption is impeded by practical challenges. Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) emerges as a possible alternative. This study investigated the performance and accuracy of LSCI in comparison with LDI for predicting the HP of burns; LDI was assumed to provide 'ground truth' for the assessment of HP. Methods: Hospitalized burn patients underwent LDI and LSCI scans between day 2 and day 5 postburn. Analysis involved selecting corresponding regions of interest (ROI) in target wounds prioritized by LDI and LSCI perspectives. Results: In 19 patients, 112 ROI within LDI-priority ranges were collected from 50 target wounds. 130 ROI within LSCI-priority ranges were collected from 52 target wounds. Positive predictive values (PPV) were low, at only 50.8 % and 68.2 % for HP14-21 and HP21, respectively, and 86.9 % for HP14. Conclusion: Objective assessment by LSCI for burns is not recommended, as it fails to detect deep dermal blood flow, leading to an overestimation of burn severity and potential inadequacies in therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for the prediction of burn wound healing potential
    Zheng, K. J.
    Middelkoop, E.
    Stoop, M.
    van Zuijlen, P. P. M.
    Pijpe, A.
    BURNS, 2022, 48 (02) : 319 - 327
  • [2] Interobserver reliability of laser speckle contrast imaging in the assessment of burns
    Mirdell, Robin
    Farnebo, Simon
    Sjoberg, Folke
    Tesselaar, Erik
    BURNS, 2019, 45 (06) : 1325 - 1335
  • [3] Microvascular blood flow in scalds in children and its relation to duration of wound healing: A study using laser speckle contrast imaging
    Mirdell, Robin
    Iredahl, Fredrik
    Sjoberg, Folke
    Farnebo, Simon
    Tesselaar, Erik
    BURNS, 2016, 42 (03) : 648 - 654
  • [4] Laser speckle contrast imaging, an alternative to laser doppler imaging in clinical practice of burn wound care derivation of a color code
    Dijkstra, Annemieke
    Guven, Goksel
    van Baar, Margriet E.
    Trommel, Nicole
    Hofland, Helma W. C.
    Kuijper, T. Martijn
    Ince, Can
    Van der Vlies, C. H.
    BURNS, 2023, 49 (08) : 1907 - 1915
  • [5] Laser speckle contrast imaging in children with scalds: Its influence on timing of intervention, duration of healing and care, and costs
    Elmasry, Moustafa
    Mirdell, Robin
    Tesselaar, Erik
    Farnebo, Simon
    Sjoberg, Folke
    Steinvall, Ingrid
    BURNS, 2019, 45 (04) : 798 - 804
  • [6] Insights into the use of thermography to assess burn wound healing potential: a reliable and valid technique when compared to laser Doppler imaging
    Jaspers, Marielle E. H.
    Maltha, Ilse
    Klaessens, John H. G. M.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Verdaasdonk, Rudolf M.
    van Zuijlen, Paul P. M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2016, 21 (09)
  • [7] Laser speckle contrast imaging: theoretical and practical limitations
    Briers, David
    Duncan, Donald D.
    Hirst, Evan
    Kirkpatrick, Sean J.
    Larsson, Marcus
    Steenbergen, Wiendelt
    Stromberg, Tomas
    Thompson, Oliver B.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2013, 18 (06)
  • [8] Reproducibility of high-resolution laser speckle contrast imaging to assess cutaneous microcirculation for wound healing monitoring in mice
    Couturier, Axel
    Bouvet, Raphael
    Cracowski, Jean-Luc
    Roustit, Matthieu
    MICROVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2022, 141
  • [9] Noise analysis in laser speckle contrast imaging
    Yuan, Shuai
    Chen, Yu
    Dunn, Andrew K.
    Boas, David A.
    DYNAMICS AND FLUCTUATIONS IN BIOMEDICAL PHOTONICS VII, 2010, 7563
  • [10] Accuracy of laser speckle contrast imaging in the assessment of pediatric scald wounds
    Mirdell, Robin
    Farnebo, Simon
    Sjoberg, Folke
    Tesselaar, Erik
    BURNS, 2018, 44 (01) : 90 - 98