Long-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Japanese Elderly Patients

被引：0
作者：
Nishibe, Toshiya [1 ,2 ]
Kano, Masaki [2 ]
Akiyama, Shinobu [2 ]
Iwahashi, Toru [2 ]
Fukuda, Shoji [2 ]
机构：
[1] Hokkaido Informat Univ, Dept Med Informat & Management, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Tokyo, Japan
来源：
ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY | 2025年 / 31卷 / 01期
关键词：
endovascular aneurysm repair; abdominal aortic aneurysm; elderly; mortality; GUIDELINES;
D O I：
10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00185
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
Purpose: Our primary concern was the risk of overtreating elderly patients with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. We investigated the association between age at the time of EVAR and all-cause mortality in Japan's aging population by stratifying patients into age groups. Methods: Data from 175 patients who underwent elective EVAR from 2012 to 2016 were analyzed. Patients were categorized into 3 age groups: <75 years, 75-84 years, and >= 85 years, based on Japan's healthy life expectancy and average life expectancy. Survival rates and risk factors for mortality were assessed across these patient groups. Results: Among 175 patients, 3- and 5-year survival rates were significantly lower in elderly patients, with rates of 74.6% and 64.2% for those aged 75-84 years and 51.9% and 39.7% for those aged >= 85 years. Multivariate analysis identified age >= 85 years, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and active cancer as independent adverse predictors of all-cause mortality, whereas obesity was identified as an independent protective predictor. Conclusions: Adjusting guidelines to incorporate not only comorbidities but also age could optimize outcomes and healthcare resource allocation by prioritizing EVAR for patients most likely to benefit in Japan's super-aging society.
引用
收藏
页数：8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Pleumeekers HJ, Hoes AW, van der Does E, Et al., Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in older adults: the Rotterdam Study, Am J Epidemiol, 142, pp. 1291-1299, (1995)
  • [2] Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Ulug P, Et al., Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endo-vascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years, Br J Surg, 104, pp. 166-178, (2017)
  • [3] Wang G, Sun Y, Lin Z, Et al., Elective endovascular vs open repair for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients ≥80 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Vasc Endovascular Surg, 57, pp. 386-401, (2023)
  • [4] Vaughan-Burleigh S, Leung YYR, Khan F, Et al., The safety and outcomes of elective endovascular aneurysm repair in the elderly: a systemic review and meta-analysis, J Endovasc Ther, 2024
  • [5] Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (JCS 2011): digest version, Circ J, 77, pp. 789-828, (2013)
  • [6] Nishibe T, Iwahashi T, Kamiya K, Et al., Two-year outcome of the Endurant stent graft for endovascular abdominal aortic repair in Japanese patients: incidence of endoleak and aneurysm sac shrinkage, Int Angiol, 36, pp. 237-242, (2017)
  • [7] Nishibe T, Iwahashi T, Kamiya K, Et al., Clinical and morphological outcomes in endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm using Gore C3 Excluder: comparison between patients treated within and outside instructions for use, Ann Vasc Surg, 59, pp. 54-62, (2019)
  • [8] Onohara T, Handa N, Kawasaki M, Et al., Long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients aged ≤70 years, Ann Vasc Dis, 17, pp. 25-33, (2024)
  • [9] Reitz KM, Liang NL, Xie B, Et al., Inferior mid-term durability with comparable survival for younger patients undergoing elective endovascular infrarenal versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, Ann Vasc Surg, 64, pp. 143-150, (2020)
  • [10] Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Et al., The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneu-rysm, J Vasc Surg, 67, pp. 2-77, (2018)
12