Modeling Teachers' Acceptance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Higher Education: The Role of AI Literacy, Intelligent TPACK, and Perceived Trust

被引:11
作者
Al-Abdullatif, Ahlam Mohammed [1 ]
机构
[1] King Faisal Univ, Coll Educ, Curriculum & Instruct Dept, POB 400, Al Hufuf 31982, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
关键词
generative artificial intelligence; GenAI; AI literacy; intelligent TPACK; acceptance; teachers; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.3390/educsci14111209
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study delves into the factors that drive teachers' adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies in higher education. Anchored by the technology acceptance model (TAM), the research expands its inquiry by integrating the constructs of intelligent technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), AI literacy, and perceived trust. Data were gathered from a sample of 237 university teachers through a structured questionnaire. The study employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to determine the relationships among the constructs. The results revealed that both AI literacy and perceived ease were the most influential factors affecting teachers' acceptance of GenAI. Notably, intelligent TPACK and perceived trust were found to be pivotal mediators in this relationship. The findings underscore the importance of fostering AI literacy and adapting intelligent TPACK frameworks to better equip educators in the age of AI. Furthermore, there is a clear need for targeted professional development initiatives focusing on practical training that enhances AI literacy. These programs should provide hands-on experience with GenAI tools, boosting educators' confidence and ability to integrate them into their teaching practices.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 64 条
[11]   Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling [J].
Chatterjee, Sheshadri ;
Bhattacharjee, Kalyan Kumar .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 25 (05) :3443-3463
[12]  
Chen X., 2020, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, V1, P100002, DOI [10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002, 10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002 10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002, DOI 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2020.100002]
[13]   Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field [J].
Crompton, Helen ;
Burke, Diane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 20 (01)
[14]  
Darayseh A. A., 2023, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, V4, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2023.100132
[16]  
Davis FD, 1985, TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANC, DOI DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.146.3652.1648
[17]   Effective or ineffective? Using ChatGPT for staffing in the hospitality industry [J].
Elmohandes, Nirmeen ;
Marghany, Mostafa .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2024, 36
[18]   The new reality of education in the face of advances in generative artificial intelligence [J].
Garcia-Penalvo, Francisco Jose ;
Llorens-Largo, Faraon ;
Vidal, Javier .
RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2024, 27 (01) :9-39
[19]   Artificial intelligence-based text generators in hepatology: ChatGPT is just the beginning [J].
Ge, Jin ;
Lai, Jennifer C. .
HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 7 (04)
[20]   Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots [J].
Gill S.S. ;
Xu M. ;
Patros P. ;
Wu H. ;
Kaur R. ;
Kaur K. ;
Fuller S. ;
Singh M. ;
Arora P. ;
Parlikad A.K. ;
Stankovski V. ;
Abraham A. ;
Ghosh S.K. ;
Lutfiyya H. ;
Kanhere S.S. ;
Bahsoon R. ;
Rana O. ;
Dustdar S. ;
Sakellariou R. ;
Uhlig S. ;
Buyya R. .
Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 2024, 4 :19-23