Multi-criteria analysis of renewable energy alternatives in southwest Sumba using TOPSIS method with 5C framework

被引:0
|
作者
Hamzah [1 ]
Lestari, Retno Martanti Endah [1 ]
Sasongko, Hendro [1 ]
Heirunissa [2 ]
Bekak, Daud Obed [3 ]
机构
[1] Pakuan Univ, Fac Econ & Business, Bogor, Indonesia
[2] STIE GICI, Fac Econ & Business, Bogor, Indonesia
[3] Politeknik Negeri Kupang, Kupang, Indonesia
关键词
Energy Security; Renewable Energy; Solar Energy; Sustainable Development; TOPSIS; DECISION-MAKING; SUSTAINABILITY; CHINA;
D O I
10.5267/j.dsl.2025.2.002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Renewable energy development is important for improving energy security and economic growth in Indonesia. This study identifies the best renewable energy potential in Southwest Sumba, East Nusa Tenggara Province, using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method based on 5C criteria: Consolidated, Controllable, Continue, Clean, and Cheap. The research uses a multi-criteria decision-making approach, using primary data from expert interviews and secondary data from literature reviews. The TOPSIS analysis shows that solar energy has the highest preference value, followed by bioenergy and hydropower. Technical assessments show important implementation requirements for each renewable energy option. The study recommends prioritizing solar energy development, supporting bioenergy projects, improving micro-hydro facilities, and creating clear renewable energy policies. Success depends on cooperation between stakeholders and aligning renewable energy development with regional sustainability and community needs. These efforts can help Southwest Sumba develop its renewable energy sector and contribute to national energy security goals.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 264
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hybrid Multi-Criteria Method of Analyzing the Location of Distributed Renewable Energy Sources
    Stoltmann, Alicja
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (16)
  • [22] A multi-criteria decision-making framework for residential building renovation using pairwise comparison and TOPSIS methods
    Amorocho, Jerson Alexis Pinzon
    Hartmann, Timo
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 53
  • [23] A two-stage multi-criteria analysis method for planning renewable energy use and carbon saving
    Ahmed, Asam
    Sutrisno, Setiadi Wicaksono
    You, Siming
    ENERGY, 2020, 199
  • [24] Trust Blog Ranking Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis AHP and TOPSIS
    Zulkefli, Nurul Akhmal Binti Mohd
    Bin Baharudin, Baharum
    Said, Abas Bin Md
    IT CONVERGENCE AND SECURITY 2017, VOL 2, 2018, 450 : 68 - 76
  • [25] Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning
    Polatidis, Heracles
    Haralambopoulos, Dias A.
    Munda, Giussepe
    Vreeker, Ron
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2006, 1 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [26] Integrating renewable energy technologies to support building trigeneration - A multi-criteria analysis
    Chua, K. J.
    Yang, W. M.
    Wong, T. Z.
    Ho, C. A.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 41 : 358 - 367
  • [27] A Multi-Criteria Optimal Operation Framework for Renewable Energy Integrated Data Center Microgrid with Waste Heat Recovery
    Li, Yuanzheng
    Huang, Jingjing
    Liu, Yun
    Wang, Hao
    Wang, Yongzhen
    Ai, Xiaomeng
    2021 IEEE/IAS 57TH INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEMS TECHNICAL CONFERENCE (I&CPS), 2021,
  • [28] A modified interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method and its application to multi-criteria selection among renewable energy alternatives in Turkey
    Deveci, Kaan
    Cin, Rabia
    Kagizman, Ahmet
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 96
  • [29] A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY SELECTION USING Z-NUMBERS IN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT
    Chatterjee, Kajal
    Kar, Samarjit
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2018, 24 (02) : 739 - 764
  • [30] A multi-criteria decision analysis framework for evaluating point-of-use water treatment alternatives
    Santos, Joost
    Pagsuyoin, Sheree Ann
    Latayan, Jana
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 18 (05) : 1263 - 1279